Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; May 1983; v. 11; no. 5; p. 259-262; DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1983)11<259:LQUSGR>2.0.CO;2
© 1983 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lively, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Late Quaternary U-series speleothem growth record from southeastern Minnesota

R. S. Lively1

1 Minnesota Geological Survey, 1633 Eustis Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108

Southeastern Minnesota contains an extensive karst, developed in limestones and dolomites ranging in age from Early Ordovician to Middle Devonian. Preliminary results from U-series dated speleothems from caves within the karst show cyclic deposition of secondary calcium carbonate that coincides with cycles of late Pleistocene glaciation. Peak intervals of deposition, which broadly correlate with interglacial or interstadial climates, occur from the present to 13,000 yr B.P., from 35,000 to 70,000 yr B.P., from 90,000 to 170,000 yr B.P., and an undivided interval from 170,000 to 350,000 yr B.P. Intervals of little or no deposition are thought to reflect glacial climates. The youngest growth intervals can be interpreted in terms of known glacial records in the Midwest, but for the older intervals, where the glacial record is not well defined and beyond the range of radioactive dating, it becomes more difficult to correlate speleothem deposition to glacial cycles. Although the groups of ages are in general agreement with sea-level curves, the correlation is not exact. Local climatic conditions seem to have had as much importance in determining when deposition occurred as did the major climatic cycles recorded in the marine record.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
D. A. Richards, D. A. Richards, and J. A. Dorale
Uranium-series Chronology and Environmental Applications of Speleothems
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2003; 52(1): 407 - 460.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
P. M. Cutler, D. M. Mickelson, P. M. Colgan, D. R. MacAyeal, and B. R. Parizek
Influence of the Great Lakes on the dynamics of the southern Laurentide ice sheet: Numerical experiments
Geology, November 1, 2001; 29(11): 1039 - 1042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The HoloceneHome page
R. F. Denniston, R. F. Denniston, L. A. Gonzalez, R. G. Baker, Y. Asmerom, M. K. Reagan, R. L. Edwards, and E. C. Alexander
Speleothem evidence for Holocene fluctuations of the prairie-forest ecotone, north-central USA
The Holocene, September 1, 1999; 9(6): 671 - 676.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
I. J. Winograd, I. J. WINOGRAD, T. B. COPLEN, B. J. SZABO, and A. C. RIGGS
A 250,000-Year Climatic Record from Great Basin Vein Calcite: Implications for Milankovitch Theory
Science, December 2, 1988; 242(4883): 1275 - 1280.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America