Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; March 1987; v. 15; no. 3; p. 262-265; DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1987)15<262:UOSITC>2.0.CO;2
© 1987 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Swart, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Holmes, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Use of strontium isotopes to constrain the timing and mode of dolomitization of upper Cenozoic sediments in a core from San Salvador, Bahamas

Peter K. Swart1, Joaquin Ruiz2 and Charles W. Holmes3

1 Laboratory for Comparative Sedimentology, Fisher Island, University of Miami, Miami Beach, Florida 33139
2 Department of Geology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721
3 U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado 80225

The 87Sr/86Sr ratios and the activity ratios of 234U/238U and 230Th/238U have been measured in dolomites from a 168-m-deep core taken on the island of San Salvador, Bahamas. These data suggest two periods of dolomitization. The first episode dolomitized Miocene age sediments during the latest Miocene, and the second dolomitized the Pliocene portion of the core and was still active as recently as 150 ka. The late timing of the second episode argues against penecontemporaneous models of dolomitization for the Pliocene sediments. Instead, dolomitization is favored either as a result of mixing-zone development during the large Pleistocene sea-level changes or by movement of seawater through the platform.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
S.N. Ehrenberg, J.M. McArthur, and M.F. Thirlwall
Growth, Demise, and Dolomitization of Miocene Carbonate Platforms on the Marion Plateau, Offshore NE Australia
Journal of Sedimentary Research, January 1, 2006; 76(1): 91 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
D. Bernoulli, L. Gasperini, E. Bonatti, and P. Stille
Dolomite Formation in Pelagic Limestone and Diatomite, Romanche Fracture Zone, Equatorial Atlantic
Journal of Sedimentary Research, November 1, 2004; 74(6): 924 - 932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
Petrography of Finely Crystalline Cenozoic Dolostones as Revealed by Backscatter Electron Imaging: Case Study of the Cayman Formation (Miocene), Grand Cayman, British West Indies
Journal of Sedimentary Research, November 1, 2003; 73(6): 1022 - 1035.



Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
Temporal Evolution of Tertiary Dolostones on Grand Cayman as Determined by 87Sr/86Sr
Journal of Sedimentary Research, March 1, 2003; 73(2): 187 - 205.



Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
Dolostones from Grand Cayman, British West Indies
Journal of Sedimentary Research, July 1, 2002; 72(4): 559 - 569.



Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
The Origin of Dolomites in Tertiary Sediments from the Margin of Great Bahama Bank
Journal of Sedimentary Research, May 1, 2000; 70(3): 738 - 748.





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America