Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; March 1988; v. 16; no. 3; p. 229-232; DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1988)016<0229:DLSISF>2.3.CO;2
© 1988 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shanmugam, G.
Right arrow Articles by Sales, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Duplex-like structures in submarine fan channels, Ouachita Mountains, Arkansas

G. Shanmugam1, R. J. Moiola1 and J. K. Sales1

1 Dallas Research Laboratory, Mobil Research and Development Corporation, P.O. Box 819047, Dallas, Texas 75381

Submarine fan channel sequences of the Jackfork Formation (Lower Pennsylvanian) at DeGray Dam section in the Ouachita Mountains, Arkansas, contain discrete units (10-75 cm thick) with moderately dipping (25°-40°), sigmoidal imbricate slices. Adjacent units with opposing imbricate slices are common. The sigmoidal structures are similar in geometry to a tectonic feature known as a duplex. A tectonic origin of sigmoidal structures, however, seems unlikely because opposing directions of imbrication in adjacent units would require an unrealistic tectonic movement history for the area. We propose that the Jackfork sigmoidal structures were formed by a process kinematically similar to that responsible for generating duplex structures. Unlike tectonic duplexes, however, the sigmoidal structures were formed by soft-sediment deformation of sand and mud layers as high-energy sediment gravity flows glided over these layers. Sediment gravity flows, responsible for forming the sigmoidal deformation, were probably generated by slumping of adjacent channel walls. Dip direction of sigmoidal slices is perpendicular to channel axes. Thus, recognition of sigmoidal deformation structures may be useful in inferring the trend of channels in ancient submarine fan complexes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
L. Moscardelli, L. Wood, and P. Mann
Mass-transport complexes and associated processes in the offshore area of Trinidad and Venezuela
AAPG Bulletin, July 1, 2006; 90(7): 1059 - 1088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
G. Shanmugam
The Tsunamite Problem
Journal of Sedimentary Research, May 1, 2006; 76(5): 718 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
J. G. Marr, P. A. Harff, G. Shanmugam, and G. Parker
Experiments on subaqueous sandy gravity flows: The role of clay and water content in flow dynamics and depositional structures
Geological Society of America Bulletin, November 1, 2001; 113(11): 1377 - 1386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America