Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; March 1988; v. 16; no. 3; p. 275-278; DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1988)016<0275:LPPPFD>2.3.CO;2
© 1988 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Zhai, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Late Permian paleomagnetic pole from dikes of the Tarim craton, China

Yianping Li1, Michael McWilliams1, Allan Cox1, Robert Sharps1, Yongan Li2, Zhengjia Gao2, Zhengkun Zhang3 and Yongjian Zhai4

1 Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
2 Xinjiang Geology Research Institute, Urumqi, Xinjiang, People's Republic of China
3 Geology Institute, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China
4 Beijing Graduate School, Wuhan Geology College, Beijing, People's Republic of China

We have obtained a Late Permian paleomagnetic pole from dikes in the Tarim craton of China. Directions of magnetization from 21 mafic and ultramafic dikes at three localities pass a fold test at the 95% confidence level. The new paleomagnetic pole lies at lat 66°N, long 181° E; N = 21, K = 61, and {alpha}95 = 3.9°. On the basis of a comparison with paleomagnetic data from adjacent tectonic units, we conclude that (1) the Late Permian paleolatitude of the Tarim craton differs from that of the Sino-Korean craton, suggesting that the two cratons were distinct tectonic units in Late Permian time; (2) there was relative motion between the Tarim craton and the Siberian craton after Late Permian time; and (3) negligible relative motions have occured between different thrust sheets in the Keping-Bachu area of the north-western Tarim craton.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society of America Special PapersHome page
C.L. Johnson, J.A. Amory, D. Zinniker, M.A. Lamb, S.A. Graham, M. Affolter, and G. Badarch
Sedimentary response to arc-continent collision, Permian, southern Mongolia
Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2008; 436(0): 363 - 390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
I. Metcalfe
Pre-Cretaceous evolution of SE Asian terranes
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1996; 106(1): 97 - 122.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, MemoirsHome page
N. Shangyou, D. B. Rowley, and A. M. Ziegler
Constraints on the locations of Asian microcontinents in Palaeo-Tethys during the Late Palaeozoic
Geological Society, London, Memoirs, January 1, 1990; 12(1): 397 - 409.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America