Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; August 1993; v. 21; no. 8; p. 719-722
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Livaccari, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Perry, F. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Isotopic evidence for preservation of Cordilleran lithospheric mantle during the Sevier-Laramide Orogeny, Western United States

Richard F. Livaccari, and Frank V. Perry

University of New Mexico, Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Albuquerque, NM, United States

It has been inferred that Sevier-Laramide flat subduction imparted a large basal shear traction force to the overriding North American plate, resulting in Laramide Rocky Mountain foreland deformation and significant thinning of Cordilleran lithosphere. Additional inferred consequences include regional refrigeration of Cordilleran crust and suppression of synorogenic extensional collapse. Nd isotopic data from Cenozoic mafic volcanic rocks indicate that normal-thickness lithospheric mantle was preserved beneath the Cordilleran craton from Precambrian to late Cenozoic time. Therefore, Cordilleran lithosphere was not thinned significantly, and extensional collapse of orogenically thickened crust was not suppressed by refrigeration. Analogy with the South American Cordillera suggests that flat subduction does not apply significant shear stress to the base of overriding plate lithosphere beyond the fore-arc region and therefore does not mechanically thin overriding plate lithosphere (except in the fore-arc region). The principal result of flat subduction was enhanced mechanical coupling between the underriding and overriding plates along the fore-arc region. This increased the horizontal end load, due to relative plate convergence, placed on the North American plate. Horizontal end-load stress was transmitted laterally across both (1) a hinterland that had attained maximum crustal thickness and (2) the rigid Colorado Plateau into the Laramide Rocky Mountain foreland. Early Tertiary waning of plate-convergence rates then allowed radial extensional collapse of the southern Cordilleran region to drive the Colorado Plateau block northward, resulting in late Laramide Rocky Mountain foreland deformation.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geol Soc Am BullHome page
M. L. Wells and T. D. Hoisch
The role of mantle delamination in widespread Late Cretaceous extension and magmatism in the Cordilleran orogen, western United States
GSA Bulletin, May 1, 2008; 120(5-6): 515 - 530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
J.P. PLATT
From orogenic hinterlands to Mediterranean-style back-arc basins: a comparative analysis
Journal of the Geological Society, March 1, 2007; 164(2): 297 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geol Soc Am BullHome page
J. Saleeby
Segmentation of the Laramide Slab--evidence from the southern Sierra Nevada region
GSA Bulletin, June 1, 2003; 115(6): 655 - 668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geol Soc Am BullHome page
G. L. Farmer, A. F. Glazner, and C. R. Manley
Did lithospheric delamination trigger late Cenozoic potassic volcanism in the southern Sierra Nevada, California?
GSA Bulletin, June 1, 2002; 114(6): 754 - 768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rocky Mountain GeologyHome page
B. Tikoff, B. Tikoff, and J. Maxson
Lithospheric buckling of the Laramide foreland during Late Cretaceous and Paleogene, western United States
Rocky Mountain Geology, July 1, 2001; 36(1): 13 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geol Soc Am BullHome page
N. J. McMillan, A. P. Dickin, and D. Haag
Evolution of magma source regions in the Rio Grande rift, southern New Mexico
GSA Bulletin, October 1, 2000; 112(10): 1582 - 1593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
C.-T. Lee, Q. Yin, R. L. Rudnick, J. T. Chesley, and S. B. Jacobsen
Osmium Isotopic Evidence for Mesozoic Removal of Lithospheric Mantle Beneath the Sierra Nevada, California
Science, September 15, 2000; 289(5486): 1912 - 1916.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Geol Soc Am BullHome page
J. S. Miller, J. S. Miller, A. F. Glazner, G. L. Farmer, I. B. Suayah, and L. A. Keith
A Sr, Nd, and Pb isotopic study of mantle domains and crustal structure from Miocene volcanic rocks in the Mojave Desert, California
GSA Bulletin, August 1, 2000; 112(8): 1264 - 1279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rocky Mountain GeologyHome page
K. E. Karlstrom
Introduction to special issues, Part II: Nature of tectonic boundaries in lithosphere of the Rocky Mountains
Rocky Mountain Geology, March 1, 1999; 34(1): 1 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rocky Mountain GeologyHome page
C. A. Shaw and K. E. Karlstrom
The Yavapai-Mazatzal crustal boundary in the Southern Rocky Mountains
Rocky Mountain Geology, March 1, 1999; 34(1): 37 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rocky Mountain GeologyHome page
K. E. Karlstrom and E. D. Humphreys
Persistent influence of Proterozoic accretionary boundaries in the tectonic evolution of southwestern North America: Interaction of cratonic grain and mantle modification events
Rocky Mountain Geology, October 1, 1998; 33(2): 161 - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rocky Mountain GeologyHome page
C. M. Snelson, T. J. Henstock, G. R. Keller, K. C. Miller, and A. Levander
Crustal and uppermost mantle structure along the Deep Probe seismic profile
Rocky Mountain Geology, October 1, 1998; 33(2): 181 - 198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Geological Society of America