Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; August 1993; v. 21; no. 8; p. 747-750; DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1993)021<0747:SSSFDT>2.3.CO;2
© 1993 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heller, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Marzo, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Stratigraphic solution sets for determining the roles of sediment supply, subsidence, and sea level on transgressions and regressions

Paul L. Heller1, Beverly A. Burns1 and Mariano Marzo2

1 Department of Geology & Geophysics, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071
2 Faculty of Geology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Although identifying unequivocally the cause of transgressions and regressions from the rock record can be difficult, we can place limits on the possible combinations of sediment supply, subsidence, and sea level that could generate an observed Stratigraphic sequence. Using simple geometric models that estimate maximum rates of change in the three controlling variables, and combining these with other limits derived from field observations, we can plot a solution set to define the most likely range of variations in these three primary controls on shoreline migration. This approach shows the amount each controlling factor must change alone, or in concert, to account for the stratigraphy. These quantitative values can be used to decide what is geologically reasonable and what is not. Although a unique solution may not be available, we can calculate the required parameters for the observed shoreline migrations, which provide a basis for informed interpretations.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
P. M. Burgess, H. Lammers, C. van Oosterhout, and D. Granjeon
Multivariate sequence stratigraphy: Tackling complexity and uncertainty with stratigraphic forward modeling, multiple scenarios, and conditional frequency maps
AAPG Bulletin, December 1, 2006; 90(12): 1883 - 1901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
W. Kim, C. Paola, V. R. Voller, and J. B. Swenson
Experimental Measurement of the Relative Importance of Controls on Shoreline Migration
Journal of Sedimentary Research, February 1, 2006; 76(2): 270 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
Discontinuity Surfaces, Clinoforms, and Facies Architecture in a Wave-Dominated, Shoreface-Shelf Parasequence
Journal of Sedimentary Research, March 1, 2000; 70(2): 325 - 340.





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America