Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; May 1994; v. 22; no. 5; p. 387-390; DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1994)022<0387:AOODSO>2.3.CO;2
© 1994 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lowe, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Abiological origin of described stromatolites older than 3.2 Ga

Donald R. Lowe1

1 Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2115

The three well-documented occurrences of three-dimensional stromatolites older than 3.2 Ga meet most criteria for biogenicity except the presence of fossil bacteria. However, they also show features more consistent with nonbiological origins. Small conical structures in the Strelley Pool chert in the upper part of the Warrawoona Group (3.5-3.2 Ga), Western Australia, lack the structure typical of stromatolites and probably formed mainly through evaporitic precipitation. A domal structure from the North Pole chert, Warrawoona Group, formed by soft-sediment deformation of originally flat layers. Laminated chert containing domal and pseudocolumnar structures in the Onverwacht Group (3.5-3.3 Ga), Barberton Greenstone Belt, South Africa, extends downward into veins and cavities, where it formed through inorganic precipitation. Although bacterial communities were widespread on Earth prior to 3.2 Ga, these particular three-dimensional structures are probably abiotic in origin and do not provide information on the paleobiology or paleobiology of early organisms. The paucity of Archean stromatolites older than 3.2 Ga probably reflects the paucity of known and possibly extant carbonate deposits of this age.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
J. W. Schopf
Fossil evidence of Archaean life
Phil Trans R Soc B, June 29, 2006; 361(1470): 869 - 885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
M. Brasier, N. McLoughlin, O. Green, and D. Wacey
A fresh look at the fossil evidence for early Archaean cellular life
Phil Trans R Soc B, June 29, 2006; 361(1470): 887 - 902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, AnalysisHome page
M. J. Van Kranendonk, M. J. Van Kranendonk, and F. Pirajno
Geochemistry of metabasalts and hydrothermal alteration zones associated with c. 3.45 Ga chert and barite deposits: implications for the geological setting of the Warrawoona Group, Pilbara Craton, Australia
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, August 1, 2004; 4(3): 253 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
C. Manikyamba and S.M. Naqvi
Mineralogy and geochemistry of Archaean greenstone belt-hosted Mn formations and deposits of the Dharwar Craton: Redox potential of proto-oceans
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1997; 119(1): 91 - 103.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America