Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Klug, C. Articles by Cashman, K. V. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Vesiculation of May 18, 1980, Mount St. Helens magma

¹ Department of Geological Sciences, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403

The May 18, 1980, eruption of Mount St. Helens, Washington, produced both white and gray pumice, similar in composition but varying in phenocryst, microlite, and vesicle content. The white pumice has fewer phenocrysts, no microlites, and higher vesicularity, and is thus less dense than the gray. In addition, vesicles in the white pumice are larger and more interconnected than those in the gray. Both white and gray have effective (crystal-free) vesicularities (85.7% and 72.2%, respectively), close to the traditionally accepted "fragmentation vesicularity" of 75%-77%. Given that the two pumice types were erupted concurrently for several phases of the eruption and therefore probably had similar eruption paths, we suggest that differences in vesicularity and vesicle size distributions result from the presence or absence of microlites. The presence of microlites in the gray pumice not only increased the magma viscosity and effective vesicularity, but appears to have aided bubble nucleation and hindered bubble expansion and coalescence. Thus, magmas with microlites may fragment at a lower bulk vesicularity than those without microlites. Fragmented microlite-bearing clasts are also likely to expand less after fragmentation and therefore more closely preserve the bubble distribution and structure at the time of magma fragmentation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. J. Andrews and J. E. Gardner Turbulent dynamics of the 18 May 1980 Mount St. Helens eruption column Geology, October 1, 2009; 37(10): 895 - 898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. K. Adams, B. F. Houghton, S. A. Fagents, and W. Hildreth The transition from explosive to effusive eruptive regime: The example of the 1912 Novarupta eruption, Alaska Geological Society of America Bulletin, May 1, 2006; 118(5-6): 620 - 634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Kennedy, O. Spieler, B. Scheu, U. Kueppers, J. Taddeucci, and D.B. Dingwell Conduit implosion during Vulcanian eruptions Geology, July 1, 2005; 33(7): 581 - 584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. PETRIK, P. I. NABELEK, M. JANAK, and D. PLASIENKA Conditions of Formation and Crystallization Kinetics of Highly Oxidized Pseudotachylytes from the High Tatras (Slovakia) J. Petrology, May 1, 2003; 44(5): 901 - 927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Yang, K. Yang, and S. D. Scott Magmatic Degassing of Volatiles and Ore Metals into a Hydrothermal System on the Modern Sea Floor of the Eastern Manus Back-Arc Basin, Western Pacific Economic Geology, August 1, 2002; 97(5): 1079 - 1100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Navon and V. Lyakhovsky Vesiculation processes in silicic magmas Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1998; 145(1): 27 - 50. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. M. Mader Conduit flow and fragmentation Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1998; 145(1): 51 - 71. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Jaupart Gas loss from magmas through conduit walls during eruption Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1998; 145(1): 73 - 90. [Abstract] [PDF]