Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Axen, G. J. Articles by Selverstone, J. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Stress state and fluid-pressure level along the Whipple detachment fault, California

¹ Departamento de Geología Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico
² Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0250

Brittle structures in the upper 200 m of the footwall of the Whipple detachment fault are used to characterize the state of stress under which the detachment slipped. They are younger than or coeval with chloride brecciation, and those that record shear typically are either moderately northeast-dipping normal structures or steep, northwest-striking, southwest-down structures that we interpret as conjugate shears. From this, we infer that the maximum principal stress was oriented 55°-80° from the detachment while they were active. The angle between the conjugate faults averages about 30°, indicating failure in the transtensional regime. During conjugate faulting the effective least principal stress was nearly equal to the tensile strength, the Whipple fault probably had a normal coefficient of static friction, and it slipped under hydrostatic to only moderately elevated fluid pressure. Rapid mineralization in the surroundings of major fault zones allows transtensional failure there and permits differential stress to be higher than if cohesionless friction limits strength. This causes resolved shear stress sufficient for slip on faults severely misoriented relative to the maximum principal stress.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Boulton, T. Davies, and M. McSaveney The frictional strength of granular fault gouge: application of theory to the mechanics of low-angle normal faults Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2009; 321(1): 9 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. J. Holk and H. P. Taylor Jr. 18O/16O Evidence for Contrasting Hydrothermal Regimes Involving Magmatic and Meteoric-Hydrothermal Waters at the Valhalla Metamorphic Core Complex, British Columbia Economic Geology, September 1, 2007; 102(6): 1063 - 1078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. J. Axen Research Focus: Significance of large-displacement, low-angle normal faults Geology, March 1, 2007; 35(3): 287 - 288. [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Christie-Blick, M. H. Anders, S. Wills, C. D. Walker, and B. Renik Observations from the Basin and Range Province (western United States) pertinent to the interpretation of regional detachment faults Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2007; 282(1): 421 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Wills, M. H. Anders, and N. Christie-Blick Pattern of Mesozoic thrust surfaces and Tertiary normal faults in the Sevier Desert subsurface, west-central Utah Am J Sci, January 1, 2005; 305(1): 42 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. S. Cowan, T. T. Cladouhos, and J. K. Morgan Structural geology and kinematic history of rocks formed along low-angle normal faults, Death Valley, California Geological Society of America Bulletin, October 1, 2003; 115(10): 1230 - 1248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]