Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; March 1996; v. 24; no. 3; p. 203-206; DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1996)024<0203:FFFDIO>2.3.CO;2
© 1996 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hudleston, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lan, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Flexural flow folding: Does it occur in nature?

Peter J. Hudleston1, Susan H. Treagus2 and Labao Lan1

1 Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
2 Department of Geology, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom

Flexural flow produces a continuous deformation equivalent to that of a flexed deck of cards of vanishing card thickness. It is assumed to be a common process by which parallel folds are formed in nature in competent, anisotropic rock layers. The strain pattern produced by flexural flow contrasts strongly with that produced in parallel folds formed by the bending or buckling of isotropic competent layers, but it has not been documented in nature. Two basic questions are thus: (1) If anisotropy is sufficiently large, will flexural flow develop, and (2) if so, are competent rocks sufficiently anisotropic for them to respond to deformation by flexural flow? A measure of planar anisotropy, A, is given by the ratio of viscosity in shortening to viscosity in shear. Finite-element modeling indicates that if the value of this ratio is greater than about 50, the strain pattern in a buckle fold in a competent layer will be almost indistinguishable from one of flexural flow. Such a high anisotropy, however, is unlikely in natural competent layers. The most texturally anisotropic rocks tend to be those rich in phyllosilicates, and these usually behave in an incompetent fashion. Common competent rocks, such as those rich in quartz and feldspar, are rarely significantly anisotropic. A strong preferred crystallographic orientation as a result of crystal-plastic flow can produce anisotropic layer behavior, but A is unlikely to exceed ~10, which is insufficiently great for folding by flexural flow. We thus conclude that flexural flow is unlikely in single competent layers. The aggregate response to deformation, however, of composite layers of alternating competent and incompetent rocks may be highly anisotropic and on average correspond to flexural flow.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
L. Bazalgette and J.-P. Petit
Fold amplification and style transition involving fractured dip-domain boundaries: buckling experiments in brittle paraffin wax multilayers and comparison with natural examples
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2007; 270(1): 157 - 169.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
G. D. Couples, H. Lewis, and P. W. Geoff Tanner
Strain partitioning during flexural-slip folding
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1998; 127(1): 149 - 165.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America