Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; March 1996; v. 24; no. 3; p. 215-218; DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1996)024<0215:EOSOIP>2.3.CO;2
© 1996 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Timothy Patterson, R.
Right arrow Articles by Fowler, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Evidence of self organization in planktic foraminiferal evolution: Implications for interconnectedness of paleoecosystems

R. Timothy Patterson1 and Anthony D. Fowler2

1 Department of Earth Sciences, Carleton University, and Ottawa-Carleton Geoscience Centre, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada
2 Department of Geology, University of Ottawa, and Ottawa-Carleton Geoscience Centre, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada

We analyzed planktic foraminiferal evolutionary data using techniques of nonlinear dynamics, a methodology new to paleontology. The data set comprises 196 extinction and speciation horizons derived from biostratigraphic ranges of 662 reliably defined species. Both extinction and speciation data sets are well characterized by power-law models. However, return maps and a predictor technique indicate that the extinction data are more highly deterministic than speciation data. We interpret the analysis, particularly extinction data, to be consistent with planktic foraminiferal evolution being organized, and not randomly driven. Our results do not preclude periodic large extinction events driven by external forces as predetermined by another system (e.g., large-body impact), or internally driven extinction processes, where spontaneously derived interdependencies cascade through the ecosystem, or some combination thereof. Our data support a model whereby the internal organization of an ecosystem regulates the response to changes in a deterministic manner, the relative scales of disturbances and extinctions depending on the degree of interdependency within the system. Thus any contention that species interactions are not sufficiently intense to generate mass extinctions can be dismissed. Random walks generated by genetic drift and the transitory nature of n-dimensional niche space may explain why speciation is less deterministic than extinction.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeologyHome page
M. M. Yacobucci
Multifractal and white noise evolutionary dynamics in Jurassic-Cretaceous Ammonoidea
Geology, February 1, 2005; 33(2): 97 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Foraminiferal ResearchHome page
R. T. Patterson, R. T. Patterson, A. D. Fowler, and B. T. Huber
EVIDENCE OF HIERARCHICAL ORGANIZATION IN THE PLANKTIC FORAMINIFERAL EVOLUTIONARY RECORD
Journal of Foraminiferal Research, April 1, 2004; 34(2): 85 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
A multiplicative multifractal model for originations and extinctions
Paleobiology, March 1, 2001; 27(1): 126 - 139.





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America