Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; November 1997; v. 25; no. 11; p. 1007-1010; DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<1007:TOTLFC>2.3.CO;2
© 1997 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Umhoefer, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dorsey, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Translation of terranes: Lessons from central Baja California, Mexico

Paul J. Umhoefer1 and Rebecca J. Dorsey1

1 Department of Geology, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011

Baja California is one of the best modern examples of a continental block, or terrane, that is translating hundreds of kilometers along a highly obliquely divergent plate. The central domain of Baja California is particularly appropriate as a modern analogue for terrane translation because it has a relatively simple late Neogene history and is a buoyant continental block that is likely to be preserved in any future accretion to the North American continent. In contrast, the deep, dense oceanic crust of the Gulf of California, where the main transform faults of the plate boundary lie, has little preservation potential. It is surprising that there is little strike-slip faulting in the central domain of Baja California, even though the plate boundary has a rift angle (angle between rift trend and azimuth of plate motion), alpha, of only 20°. Recent field data confirm modeling studies of oblique rifting and show that there is a predictable change in fault type, fault orientation, and extension direction with changing rift angle. That is, from secondary structures alone, one can predict the approximate obliquity of rifting and the orientation of the plate motion. With rift angles of 0°–20°, strike-slip faults at low angles to the rift trend will dominate the secondary structures; with rift angles from ~ 20° to ~ 35°, there are strike-slip faults subparallel to the rift trend and normal faults 20°–40° clockwise from the rift trend in dextral shear; above ~ 35°, normal faults are dominant, and there are few or no strike-slip faults as secondary structures.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
A. P. M. Vaughan, P. T. Leat, and R. J. Pankhurst
Terrane processes at the margins of Gondwana: introduction
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2005; 246(1): 1 - 21.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
R. J. Dorsey and P. J. Umhoefer
Tectonic and eustatic controls on sequence stratigraphy of the Pliocene Loreto basin, Baja California Sur, Mexico
Geological Society of America Bulletin, February 1, 2000; 112(2): 177 - 199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America