Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; November 1997; v. 25; no. 11; p. 971-974; DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<0971:TOSOCS>2.3.CO;2
© 1997 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bridge, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Thickness of sets of cross strata and planar strata as a function of formative bed-wave geometry and migration, and aggradation rate

John S. Bridge1

1 Department of Geological Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York 13902-6000

Cross strata and planar strata (formed by the migration of ripples and dunes or low-relief bed waves on upper-stage plane beds, respectively) are the most common internal structures in fluvial sands and sandstones. The thickness of cross sets or planar laminae at a given location is controlled by (1) aggradation rate relative to downstream migration rate of bed waves and (2) the succession of bed waves of varying height passing the location. A quantitative understanding of this relationship is now appearing, based on new theory and experimental studies with ripples, dunes, and upper-stage plane beds. In many cases, the effects of control 1 can be ignored. In such cases, only the largest bed waves in a population form cross sets or planar laminae; the ratio of mean cross-set thickness/mean height of formative bed waves is less than 0.4, and the ratio of mean cross-set thickness/mean height of all bed waves is less than 0.5. A simple quantitative model (a modified form of the Paola-Borgman model) is presented for predicting the height distributions of bed waves (ripples, dunes, low-relief bed waves) from the thickness distributions of cross sets or planar laminae. If the aggradation rate is appreciable, more of the smaller bed waves in a population can form cross sets or planar laminae, and the preservation ratios increase (to 1 in the case of supercritical climbing-ripple cross strata). In this case, it is necessary to determine the angle of climb and length of the bed waves in order to use the model to predict bed-wave height distributions.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
R. Lynds and E. Hajek
Conceptual model for predicting mudstone dimensions in sandy braided-river reservoirs
AAPG Bulletin, August 1, 2006; 90(8): 1273 - 1288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
D. J. Jerolmack and D. Mohrig
Frozen dynamics of migrating bedforms
Geology, January 1, 2005; 33(1): 57 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
A Preliminary Experimental Study of Turbidite Fan Deposits: Reply
Journal of Sedimentary Research, September 1, 2003; 73(5): 839 - 841.



Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
Quantitative Interpretation of Sedimentary Structures Formed by River Dunes
Journal of Sedimentary Research, September 1, 2001; 71(5): 713 - 716.



Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
Interpreting the Dimensions of Ancient Fluvial Channel Bars, Channels, and Channel Belts from Wireline-Logs and Cores
AAPG Bulletin, August 1, 2000; 84(8): 1205 - 1228.





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America