Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Seyedolali, A. Articles by Goles, G. G. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Provenance interpretation of quartz by scanning electron microscope–cathodoluminescence fabric analysis

¹ Department of Geological Sciences, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1272
² Kaaterskill Exploration, 691 Robinson Drive, Prescott, Arizona 86303
³ Department of Geology, University of Oslo, Blindern, P.O. Box 1047, Blindern, N-0316, Oslo, Norway

We used a cathodoluminescence (CL) detector attached to a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to study patterns of variable-intensity CL in quartz grains from a variety of igneous, metamorphic, sedimentary, and shock-deformed (meteorite-impact) rocks. Distinctive fabrics in quartz grains revealed by SEM-imaged differential CL include zoning, healed fractures, complex shears, planar features (shocked quartz), dark CL streaks and patches, indistinct, mottled texture, and nondifferential (low-contrast) CL. Zoning is common in volcanic quartz and some plutonic quartz. Zoned plutonic quartz is distinguished from volcanic quartz by the presence of closed fractures and dark CL streaks and patches. Metamorphic quartz displays either an indistinct, mottled texture, or nearly uniform (nondifferential) CL. Quartz from rocks severely deformed by tectonism displays a complex pattern of multiple, small-scale shears. Quartz from meteorite-impact sites and some system boundaries is characterized by intricate patterns of planar features, presumably created by shock metamorphism. Thus, the SEM-CL fabric-analysis technique provides a rapid method for distinguishing quartz from a variety of source rocks.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. PATRANABIS-DEB, J. SCHIEBER, and A. BASU Almandine garnet phenocrysts in a ~ 1 Ga rhyolitic tuff from central India Geological Magazine, January 1, 2009; 146(1): 133 - 143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. R. Smyth, R. Hall, and G. J. Nichols Significant Volcanic Contribution to Some Quartz-Rich Sandstones, East Java, Indonesia Journal of Sedimentary Research, May 1, 2008; 78(5): 335 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Bernet and K. Bassett Provenance Analysis by Single-Quartz-Grain SEM-CL/Optical Microscopy Journal of Sedimentary Research, May 1, 2005; 75(3): 492 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. HARRIS, A. McMILLAN, M. HOLNESS, R. UKEN, M. WATKEYS, N. ROGERS, and A. FALLICK Melt Generation and Fluid Flow in the Thermal Aureole of the Bushveld Complex J. Petrology, June 1, 2003; 44(6): 1031 - 1054. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Is Quartz Cathodoluminescence Color a Reliable Provenance Tool? A Quantitative Examination Journal of Sedimentary Research, May 1, 2002; 72(3): 408 - 415.

				S. C. Penniston-Dorland Illumination of vein quartz textures in a porphyry copper ore deposit using scanned cathodoluminescence: Grasberg Igneous Complex, Irian Jaya, Indonesia American Mineralogist, May 1, 2001; 86(5-6): 652 - 666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. R. Watt, N. H. S. Oliver, and B. J. Griffin Evidence for reaction-induced microfracturing in granulite facies migmatites Geology, April 1, 2000; 28(4): 327 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]