Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; September 1997; v. 25; no. 9; p. 823-826; DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<0823:NDCOFI>2.3.CO;2
© 1997 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roselle, G. T.
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Nucleation-dominated crystallization of forsterite in the Ubehebe Peak contact aureole, California

Gregory T. Roselle1, Lukas P. Baumgartner1 and John A. Chapman1

1 Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

The morphology and number of forsterite crystals in the Ubehebe Peak, California, contact aureole vary systematically as a function of metamorphic grade. From their first appearance to as close as ~150 m from the intrusive contact, forsterite crystals are large (5–20 mm) and have a tabular habit (a {approx} c >> b). In contrast, forsterite near the contact is equigranular and much smaller (<1 mm in diameter). The number of crystals per mole of forsterite increases from 3.5 x 104 at the forsterite-in isograd to more than 1.5 x 108 near the contact. This trend is interpreted to result from an increase in the ratio of nucleation rates with respect to growth rates with proximity to the intrusion. The change in morphology from tabular to equigranular is explained by kinetic surface roughening. The nucleation and growth information gained from this study highlights the important role of nucleation kinetics in the crystallization of forsterite at the Ubehebe Peak aureole.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
A. P. Willner, F. A. Sepulveda, F. Herve, H.-J. Massonne, and M. Sudo
Conditions and Timing of Pumpellyite-Actinolite-facies Metamorphism in the Early Mesozoic Frontal Accretionary Prism of the Madre de Dios Archipelago (Latitude 50{degrees}20'S; Southern Chile)
J. Petrology, November 6, 2009; (2009) egp071v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
T. Muller, L. P. Baumgartner, C. T. Foster JR, and J. R. Bowman
Crystal Size Distribution of Periclase in Contact Metamorphic Dolomite Marbles from the Southern Adamello Massif, Italy
J. Petrology, March 1, 2009; 50(3): 451 - 465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
T. Muller, L. P. Baumgartner, C. T. Foster Jr., and G. T. Roselle
Forward modeling of the effects of mixed volatile reaction, volume diffusion, and formation of submicroscopic exsolution lamellae on calcite-dolomite thermometry
American Mineralogist, August 1, 2008; 93(8-9): 1245 - 1259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America