Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Woolfe, K. J. Articles by Purdon, R. G. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Lowstand rivers need not incise the shelf: An example from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia, with implications for sequence stratigraphic models

¹ Marine Geophysical Laboratory, School of Earth Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia

A key tenet of many sequence stratigraphic models is that sea-level lowering causes widespread fluvial incision of the subaerially exposed continental shelf, and that river-borne terrigenoclastic sediments bypass the lowstand shoreline via canyons to the continental slope and basin floor. Consequently the occurrence of incised channels is considered a fundamental criterion for the recognition of sequence boundaries in ancient shelf successions. Contrary to this, we argue that rivers may not necessarily incise during glacio-eustatic lowstands if they flow out onto a coastal plain flanked by a broad, low-angle shelf. On the Great Barrier Reef shelf, fluvial incision did not occur during the last glacial maximum (LGM), but instead, subaerial accommodation was created and infilled as contemporary rivers graded to the "LGM-bayline." Incision was restricted to the lowstand shelf break, where canyons of limited extent formed by nickpoint retreat.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Paquet, J.-N. Proust, P. M. Barnes, and J. R. Pettinga Inner-Forearc Sequence Architecture in Response to Climatic and Tectonic Forcing Since 150 ka: Hawke's Bay, New Zealand Journal of Sedimentary Research, March 1, 2009; 79(3): 97 - 124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. L. Petter and T. Muto Sustained Alluvial Aggradation and Autogenic Detachment of the Alluvial River from the Shoreline in Response to Steady Fall of Relative Sea Level Journal of Sedimentary Research, February 1, 2008; 78(2): 98 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. C. Runkel, J. F. Miller, R. M. McKay, A. R. Palmer, and J. F. Taylor High-resolution sequence stratigraphy of lower Paleozoic sheet sandstones in central North America: The role of special conditions of cratonic interiors in development of stratal architecture Geological Society of America Bulletin, July 1, 2007; 119(7-8): 860 - 881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. R. Fielding, J. D. Trueman, and J. Alexander Holocene Depositional History of the Burdekin River Delta of Northeastern Australia: A Model for a Low-Accommodation, Highstand Delta Journal of Sedimentary Research, March 1, 2006; 76(3): 411 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. D. Celma, L. Ragaini, G. Cantalamessa, and W. Landini Basin physiography and tectonic influence on sequence architecture and stacking pattern: Pleistocene succession of the Canoa Basin (central Ecuador) Geological Society of America Bulletin, September 1, 2005; 117(9-10): 1226 - 1241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. C. Page, G. R. Dickens, and G. B. Dunbar Tropical view of Quaternary sequence stratigraphy: Siliciclastic accumulation on slopes east of the Great Barrier Reef since the Last Glacial Maximum Geology, November 1, 2003; 31(11): 1013 - 1016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Sequence Stratigraphy of the Neoproterozoic Infra Krol Formation and Krol Group, Lesser Himalaya, India Journal of Sedimentary Research, July 1, 2002; 72(4): 524 - 542.