Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; November 1998; v. 26; no. 11; p. 967-970
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scholz, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Contreras, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Mechanics of continental rift architecture

Christopher H. Scholz, and Juan C. Contreras

Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Palisades, NY, United States

Continental rifts are long narrow features bounded on one or both sides by normal faults along which several kilometers of displacement has occurred, resulting in deep rift valleys that form sedimentary basins. Continental rifts all share the same geometrical features: They have widths that are characteristic of the region in which they form, they are predominantly asymmetric, and they are segmented along axes at a length scale that is also characteristic of the region. We describe a very simple mechanical model to explain these three features. The rift initiates with the formation of a conjugate set of normal faults that intersect at the center of the seismogenic layer. One of these becomes the boundary fault system; the other, the failed conjugate fault (being offset by the former), becomes locked early in the rifting history. Hence an asymmetric graben is formed, which is the basic building block of rifts. The failed conjugate fault has distinctive properties that allow it to be easily distinguished from other faults. Examples of these faults from the Tanganyika and Malawi rifts show excellent agreement with predictions about their positions with respect to the boundary fault system and their net displacement and slip history. The width of the asymmetric graben is a simple function of seismogenic thickness. The net displacement on the boundary fault system is limited by the resistive friction and the flexural restoring force. We calculate this limiting boundary fault system displacement and, using the displacement-length scaling law for normal faults, suggest that this controls the along-axis segmentation length. Both maximum fault slip and segmentation length are functions of the seismogenic thickness and the effective elastic thickness of the crust. These calculations agree very well with observations of segmentation from the African rifts and the maximum length of range-fronting normal faults in Nevada.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeologyHome page
A. L. Densmore, N. H. Dawers, S. Gupta, and R. Guidon
What sets topographic relief in extensional footwalls?
Geology, June 1, 2005; 33(6): 453 - 456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geol Soc Am BullHome page
P. J. Umhoefer, L. Mayer, and R. J. Dorsey
Evolution of the margin of the Gulf of California near Loreto, Baja California Peninsula, Mexico
GSA Bulletin, July 1, 2002; 114(7): 849 - 868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
Evolution of Stratigraphic Sequences in Multisegmented Continental Rift Basins: Comparison of Computer Models with the Basins of the East African Rift System
AAPG Bulletin, September 1, 2001; 85(9): 1565 - 1581.





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Geological Society of America