Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; April 1998; v. 26; no. 4; p. 367-370; DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1998)026<0367:FSARTO>2.3.CO;2
© 1998 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pyle, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Forecasting sizes and repose times of future extreme volcanic events

David M. Pyle1

1 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EQ, United Kingdom

By using rank-order statistics, it is possible to predict the likely scale of future "extreme" volcanic events (eruptions larger than a given threshold size, or repose periods longer than a given time) on both a local and global scale. When ranked by diminishing size, the largest and most devastating volcanic eruptions in terms of volume, or consequent fatalities, can be described by power-law functions. In turn, this approach permits projection of, for example, (1) the likely size of the next volcanic eruption larger than the A.D. 1815 eruption of Tambora (~90 km3 of magma); (2) the size of the next eruption of the Taupo volcano, New Zealand, that is larger than the eruption of A.D. 186 (~82 km3 of tephra); and (3) the likely duration of the current repose period of the Taupo volcano (4000 ± 1200 years). This approach can also be employed on shorter time scales, for example to provide quantitative criteria to assess when a period of activity has ceased. With the establishment of procedures for making projections such as these, volcano hazard assessment may be placed onto a more rigorous and quantitative basis.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeologyHome page
S.F.L. Watt, T.A. Mather, and D.M. Pyle
Vulcanian explosion cycles: Patterns and predictability
Geology, September 1, 2007; 35(9): 839 - 842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
D.M. Gravley, C.J.N. Wilson, G.S. Leonard, and J.W. Cole
Double trouble: Paired ignimbrite eruptions and collateral subsidence in the Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand
Geological Society of America Bulletin, January 1, 2007; 119(1-2): 18 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc AHome page
S Self
The effects and consequences of very large explosive volcanic eruptions
Phil Trans R Soc A, August 15, 2006; 364(1845): 2073 - 2097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeosphereHome page
D. M. Pyle and J. R. Elliott
Quantitative morphology, recent evolution, and future activity of the Kameni Islands volcano, Santorini, Greece
Geosphere, August 1, 2006; 2(5): 253 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
R. M. Newnham, D. J. Lowe, and P. W. Williams
Quaternary environmental change in New Zealand: a review
Progress in Physical Geography, December 1, 1999; 23(4): 567 - 610.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America