Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mountney, N. Articles by Jerram, D. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Relating eolian bounding-surface geometries to the bed forms that generated them: Etjo Formation, Cretaceous, Namibia

¹ Stratigraphy Group, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK
² Institut für Geologie, Universität Würzburg, Pleicherwall 1, 97070 Würzburg, Germany

The Cretaceous Etjo Formation is a 200-m-thick eolian and fluvial sandstone succession exposed in the Huab Basin of northwestern Namibia. Eolian sedimentation was terminated abruptly by the emplacement of flood basalts of the Etendeka igneous province across much of the basin at 132 ± 1 Ma. The lavas "drowned" the dunes and, in doing so, preserved bed forms with heights and wavelengths of up to 100 m and 1.3 km, respectively. Subsequent erosion has resulted in the exposure of these bed forms and provides a rare opportunity to accurately reconstruct the three-dimensional geometry of an ancient eolian system and to relate bed-form morphology to bounding-surface geometries. Some bed forms lacked a single active slipface but instead were characterized by a dome form over which smaller transverse dunes migrated. Other bed forms were characterized by an active slipface and a stoss slope over which smaller, superimposed bed forms migrated. One bed form records a transitional evolution between these two end-member types. Preserved bed sets exhibit a positive (but stoss-erosional) angle of downwind bed-form climb of 1°. Bed forms of the Etjo Formation provide an opportunity to directly relate bed-set thickness to original bed-form height via the angle of climb.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. P. Langford, K. M. Pearson, K. A. Duncan, D. M. Tatum, L. Adams, and P.-A. Depret Eolian Topography as a Control on Deposition Incorporating Lessons from Modern Dune Seas: Permian Cedar Mesa Sandstone, SE Utah, U.S.A. Journal of Sedimentary Research, June 1, 2008; 78(6): 410 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Rice and J. M. Moore PHYSICAL MODELING OF THE FORMATION OF KOMATIITE-HOSTED NICKEL DEPOSITS AND A REVIEW OF THE THERMAL EROSION PARADIGM Can Mineral, April 1, 2001; 39(2): 491 - 503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Howell and N. Mountney Aeolian grain flow architecture: hard data for reservoir models and implications for red bed sequence stratigraphy Petroleum Geoscience, March 1, 2001; 7(1): 51 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Jerram, D. A. JERRAM, N. P. MOUNTNEY, J. A. HOWELL, D. LONG, and H. STOLLHOFEN Death of a sand sea: an active aeolian erg systematically buried by the Etendeka flood basalts of NW Namibia Journal of the Geological Society, May 1, 2000; 157(3): 513 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]