Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; March 2000; v. 28; no. 3; p. 215-218; DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(2000)28<215:ROCITS>2.0.CO;2
© 2000 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kennett, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Fackler-Adams, B. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Relationship of clathrate instability to sediment deformation in the upper Neogene of California

James P. Kennett1 and Benjamin N. Fackler-Adams*,1

1 Department of Geological Sciences and Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA

Widespread soft-sediment deformation (SSD) in upper-bathyal continental-margin sediments has been explained by compaction-related dewatering and related physical processes that can destabilize margin sediments. We present the hypothesis that SSD in such facies resulted in part from instability of gas hydrates (clathrates), leading to overpressurization in sediments and resulting fluid flow and brecciation. Clathrate-related deformation must be widespread in upper-bathyal continental-margin methanogenic sequences at depths where clathrates are destabilized by changes in bottom-water temperatures and sea level. A close association exists between an array of SSD features with clathrate-hosting sediments in ocean drill cores. Similar features are conspicuous in the partly laminated, upper Neogene upper bathyal sediments of the Sisquoc Formation in southern California, suggesting that clathrates may have been responsible for abundant and well-developed SSD in these units. The lithology, methane-producing organic content, and depositional environment of the Sisquoc Formation are similar to those features in modern clathrate-hosting settings. These characteristics, in conjunction with the upper bathyal paleobathymetry of the unit, the geothermal gradient of the region, and {delta}13C values of benthic foraminifera and dolomite concretions suggest the occurrence of clathrates in the shallow subsurface of these sediments. We suggest that the analyzed parts of the Sisquoc Formation represent an exhumed zone of SSD resulting from clathrate instability in the shallow subsurface of the continental margin. Sedimentary rocks exhibiting an association of SSD features that resulted from clathrate formation and dissociation are named clathrites.

Key Words: soft-sediment deformation • gas hydrates • Sisquoc • clathrates • Neogene sediments




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeologyHome page
B. M.A. Teichert, N. Gussone, A. Eisenhauer, and G. Bohrmann
Clathrites: Archives of near-seafloor pore-fluid evolution ({delta}44/40Ca, {delta}13C, {delta}18O) in gas hydrate environments
Geology, March 1, 2005; 33(3): 213 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
A. J. Maltman and A. Bolton
How sediments become mobilized
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2003; 216(1): 9 - 20.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
K. H. Freeman and K. H. Freeman
Isotopic Biogeochemistry of Marine Organic Carbon
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2001; 43(1): 579 - 605.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America