|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA
2 Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
3 Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
4 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California 94035, USA
5 Department of Geosciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1063, USA
The Chuar Group (
1600 m thick) preserves a record of extensional tectonism, ocean-chemistry fluctuations, and biological diversification during the late Neoproterozoic Era. An ash layer from the top of the section has a U-Pb zircon age of 742 ± 6 Ma. The Chuar Group was deposited at low latitudes during extension on the north-trending Butte fault system and is inferred to record rifting during the breakup of Rodinia. Shallow-marine deposition is documented by tide- and wave-generated sedimentary structures, facies associations, and fossils. C isotopes in organic carbon show large stratigraphic variations, apparently recording incipient stages of the marked C isotopic fluctuations that characterize later Neoproterozoic time. Upper Chuar rocks preserve a rich biota that includes not only cyanobacteria and algae, but also heterotrophic protists that document increased food web complexity in Neoproterozoic ecosystems. The Chuar Group thus provides a well-dated, high-resolution record of early events in the sequence of linked tectonic, biogeochemical, environmental, and biological changes that collectively ushered in the Phanerozoic Eon.
Key Words: Rodinia Chuar Group Grand Canyon Neoproterozoic C isotopes
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. E. Canfield, S. W. Poulton, A. H. Knoll, G. M. Narbonne, G. Ross, T. Goldberg, and H. Strauss Ferruginous Conditions Dominated Later Neoproterozoic Deep-Water Chemistry Science, August 15, 2008; 321(5891): 949 - 952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Lund Geometry of the Neoproterozoic and Paleozoic rift margin of western Laurentia: Implications for mineral deposit settings Geosphere, April 1, 2008; 4(2): 429 - 444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Bloch, J. M. Timmons, L. J. Crossey, G. E. Gehrels, and K. E. Karlstrom Mudstone Petrology of the Mesoproterozoic Unkar Group, Grand Canyon, U.S.A.: Provenance, Weathering, and Sediment Transport on Intracratonic Rodinia Journal of Sedimentary Research, September 1, 2006; 76(9): 1106 - 1119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.M. Dehler, M. Elrick, J.D. Bloch, L.J. Crossey, K.E. Karlstrom, and D.J. D. Marais High-resolution {delta}13C stratigraphy of the Chuar Group (ca. 770-742 Ma), Grand Canyon: Implications for mid-Neoproterozoic climate change Geological Society of America Bulletin, January 1, 2005; 117(1-2): 32 - 45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.C. Pigage and J.K. Mortensen Superimposed Neoproterozoic and Early Tertiary alkaline magmatism in the La Biche River area, southeast Yukon Territory Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, December 1, 2004; 52(4): 325 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Fanning and P. K. Link U-Pb SHRIMP ages of Neoproterozoic (Sturtian) glaciogenic Pocatello Formation, southeastern Idaho Geology, October 1, 2004; 32(10): 881 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. A. Corsetti and A. J. Kaufman Stratigraphic investigations of carbon isotope anomalies and Neoproterozoic ice ages in Death Valley, California Geological Society of America Bulletin, August 1, 2003; 115(8): 916 - 932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Sears and R. A. Price Tightening the Siberian connection to western Laurentia Geological Society of America Bulletin, August 1, 2003; 115(8): 943 - 953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
VASE-SHAPED MICROFOSSILS FROM THE NEOPROTEROZOIC CHUAR GROUP, GRAND CANYON: A CLASSIFICATION GUIDED BY MODERN TESTATE AMOEBAE Journal of Paleontology, May 1, 2003; 77(3): 409 - 429. |
||||
![]() |
F. A. Corsetti, S. M. Awramik, and D. Pierce A complex microbiota from snowball Earth times: Microfossils from the Neoproterozoic Kingston Peak Formation, Death Valley, USA PNAS, April 15, 2003; 100(8): 4399 - 4404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Lund, J. N. Aleinikoff, K. V. Evans, and C. M. Fanning SHRIMP U-Pb geochronology of Neoproterozoic Windermere Supergroup, central Idaho: Implications for rifting of western Laurentia and synchroneity of Sturtian glacial deposits Geological Society of America Bulletin, March 1, 2003; 115(3): 349 - 372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. D. ASHWAL, D. DEMAIFFE, and T. H. TORSVIK Petrogenesis of Neoproterozoic Granitoids and Related Rocks from the Seychelles: the Case for an Andean-type Arc Origin J. Petrology, January 1, 2002; 43(1): 45 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Stewart, G. E. Gehrels, A. P. Barth, P. K. Link, N. Christie-Blick, and C. T. Wrucke Detrital zircon provenance of Mesoproterozoic to Cambrian arenites in the western United States and northwestern Mexico Geological Society of America Bulletin, October 1, 2001; 113(10): 1343 - 1356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Cawood, P. J.A. McCausland, and G. R. Dunning Opening Iapetus: Constraints from the Laurentian margin in Newfoundland Geological Society of America Bulletin, April 1, 2001; 113(4): 443 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Timmons, K. E. Karlstrom, C. M. Dehler, J. W. Geissman, and M. T. Heizler Proterozoic multistage (ca. 1.1 and 0.8 Ga) extension recorded in the Grand Canyon Supergroup and establishment of northwest- and north-trending tectonic grains in the southwestern United States Geological Society of America Bulletin, February 1, 2001; 113(2): 163 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Testate amoebae in the Neoproterozoic Era: evidence from vase-shaped microfossils in the Chuar Group, Grand Canyon Paleobiology, September 1, 2000; 26(3): 360 - 385. |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |