Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; September 2000; v. 28; no. 9; p. 835-838; DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(2000)28<835:RAPOBI>2.0.CO;2
© 2000 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whipple, K. X.
Right arrow Articles by Dollenmayer, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Rates and processes of bedrock incision by the Upper Ukak River since the 1912 Novarupta ash flow in the Valley of Ten Thousand Smokes, Alaska

Kelin X. Whipple*,1, Noah P. Snyder*,1 and Kate Dollenmayer*,1

1 Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

The rates and patterns of bedrock channel incision significantly influence landscape evolution and long-term interactions among climate, tectonics, and erosion. Unfortunately, only sparse field data are available to quantify the controls on river incision rates. We exploit the diversion of the upper Ukak River by an ash flow in 1912 to measure rates of incision along a newly formed bedrock channel. Minimum estimates of the rate of incision into intact rock vary from 0.01 to 0.10 m yr–1. This variation reflects differences in channel slope, channel width, lithologic facies, and intensity of jointing as well as the effects of upstream knickpoint migration. A stream-power–type incision model adequately explains the incision-rate data, provided (1) variations in channel width are prescribed on the basis of field measurements, (2) the slope exponent is significantly less than unity (n = 0.4 ± 0.2), and (3) observed downstream changes in lithologic facies and the intensity of jointing account for the apparent twofold downstream decrease in the coefficient of erosion. Despite the very rapid rate of incision, calibrated stream-power erosion coefficients for the Ukak River (K = 2.4 x 10–4 m0.2 yr–1 to 9.0 x 10–4 m0.2 yr–1) are within the range of previously published estimates. Two plausible explanations for the low values of the slope exponent n are that incision rate is limited by either (1) a combination of physical weathering and hydrodynamic joint-block extraction or (2) block fracture due to bedload impacts modulated on steeper channel segments by suspension of a significant fraction of the sediment load.

Key Words: geomorphology • fluvial erosion • erosion rates • Katmai National Park




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
A. S. Goudie
The Schmidt Hammer in geomorphological research
Progress in Physical Geography, December 1, 2006; 30(6): 703 - 718.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
A. T. Codilean, P. Bishop, and T. B. Hoey
Surface process models and the links between tectonics and topography
Progress in Physical Geography, July 1, 2006; 30(3): 307 - 333.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America Special PapersHome page
F. Kober, F. Schlunegger, G. Zeilinger, and H. Schneider
Surface uplift and climate change: The geomorphic evolution of the Western Escarpment of the Andes of northern Chile between the Miocene and present
Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2006; 398(0): 75 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America Special PapersHome page
N. M. Gasparini, R. L. Bras, and K. X. Whipple
Numerical modeling of non-steady-state river profile evolution using a sediment-flux-dependent incision model
Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2006; 398(0): 127 - 141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
J. D. Stock, D. R. Montgomery, B. D. Collins, W. E. Dietrich, and L. Sklar
Field measurements of incision rates following bedrock exposure: Implications for process controls on the long profiles of valleys cut by rivers and debris flows
Geological Society of America Bulletin, January 1, 2005; 117(1-2): 174 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ajsHome page
D. R. Montgomery
Observations on the role of lithology in strath terrace formation and bedrock channel width
Am J Sci, May 1, 2004; 304(5): 454 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
B. Pratt, D. W. Burbank, A. Heimsath, and T. Ojha
Impulsive alluviation during early Holocene strengthened monsoons, central Nepal Himalaya
Geology, October 1, 2002; 30(10): 911 - 914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
K. Hartshorn, N. Hovius, W. B. Dade, and R. L. Slingerland
Climate-Driven Bedrock Incision in an Active Mountain Belt
Science, September 20, 2002; 297(5589): 2036 - 2038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
E. S.J. Dollar
Fluvial geomorphology
Progress in Physical Geography, March 1, 2002; 26(1): 123 - 143.
[PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
L. S. Sklar and W. E. Dietrich
Sediment and rock strength controls on river incision into bedrock
Geology, December 1, 2001; 29(12): 1087 - 1090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
E. E. Wohl and D. M. Merritt
Bedrock channel morphology
Geological Society of America Bulletin, September 1, 2001; 113(9): 1205 - 1212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
E. Kirby and K. Whipple
Quantifying differential rock-uplift rates via stream profile analysis
Geology, May 1, 2001; 29(5): 415 - 418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America