Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; March 2001; v. 29; no. 3; p. 259-262; DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0259:BUG>2.0.CO;2
© 2001 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Catania, G.
Right arrow Articles by Paola, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Braiding under glass

Ginny Catania*,1 and Chris Paola1

1 Department of Geology and Geophysics and St. Anthony Falls Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA

Water under glaciers and ice streams often flows under pressure over an erodible substrate. Do the channel patterns produced by such flows resemble those of their free-surface counterparts? We studied pressure-driven water flow over an erodible, noncohesive bed using a physical model with a transparent, rigid lid. The dominant channel pattern produced in the model is a widely distributed, braided network of broad, shallow channels. Relative to braided networks formed under equivalent free-surface conditions, those formed under pressure show higher braiding intensity, greater channel curvature and variability of flow direction, and more sharply defined channel margins. Increasing discharge increases braiding intensity, maximum channel size, and variability of flow direction. Downstream pressure gradients are insensitive to changes in discharge, which may in part reflect a tendency to maintain constant shear stress in the channels, as observed in rivers. Lateral pressure gradients measured in the pressurized model indicate that pressure surfaces are highly variable in both magnitude and direction over time and space. When converted to equivalent topographic slope, these pressure gradients represent much larger lateral slopes than are typically produced in rivers, accounting for the wider range of channel directions in the pressurized-flow experiments.

Key Words: subglacial environment • braided channels • ice streams • flume studies • drainage patterns




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
E. S.J. Dollar
Fluvial geomorphology
Progress in Physical Geography, March 1, 2002; 26(1): 123 - 143.
[PDF]


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
D. J.A. Evans
Glaciers
Progress in Physical Geography, September 1, 2001; 25(3): 428 - 439.
[PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Geological Society of America