Quick
Search: 		  
advanced search
 GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Geology; September 2001; v. 29; no. 9; p. 771-774; DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0771:ADTTGO>2.0.CO;2
© 2001 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muto, T.
Right arrow Articles by Steel, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Autostepping during the transgressive growth of deltas: Results from flume experiments

Tetsuji Muto1 and Ron J. Steel1

1 Institute for Energy Research, University of Wyoming, P.O. Box 4068, Laramie, Wyoming 82071, USA

A series of three-dimensional flume experiments on the transgressive growth of deltas, conducted with constant rate of relative sea-level rise (A), constant sediment discharge (S), and constant upstream water discharge (Q), reveals an inbuilt geomorphic process that inevitably forms discrete steps on the abandoned subaqueous deltaic slope. The stepped topography and its process of formation are here referred to as autostep(s) and autostepping, respectively. The stepped topography is caused by the lateral migration of delta- front lobes that inevitably shift landward but fail to cover lobes of older cycles. The autostepping arises from the principle of autoretreat combined with autocyclic lateral shifting of the feeder system. Discrete changes of A, S, A/S, or Q/S are not required to explain the origin of episodic backstepping in an overall transgressive regime. Allocyclic changes in A and S, as commonly invoked in the sequence stratigraphy literature, are not an alternative to autostepping, but would only enhance or reduce the inbuilt process of autostepping in river-dominated delta systems.

Key Words: transgression • sequence stratigraphy • deltas • sea-level changes • flume studies




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 AAPG BulletinHome page
J. Martin, C. Paola, V. Abreu, J. Neal, and B. Sheets
Sequence stratigraphy of experimental strata under known conditions of differential subsidence and variable base level
AAPG Bulletin, April 1, 2009; 93(4): 503 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Petroleum GeoscienceHome page
J. A. Howell, A. Skorstad, A. MacDonald, A. Fordham, S. Flint, B. Fjellvoll, and T. Manzocchi
Sedimentological parameterization of shallow-marine reservoirs
Petroleum Geoscience, February 1, 2008; 14(1): 17 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
T. Muto, R. J. Steel, and J. B. Swenson
Autostratigraphy: A Framework Norm for Genetic Stratigraphy
Journal of Sedimentary Research, January 1, 2007; 77(1): 2 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeologyHome page
T. Muto and R. J. Steel
Autogenic response of fluvial deltas to steady sea-level fall: Implications from flume-tank experiments
Geology, May 1, 2004; 32(5): 401 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America