Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; January 2002; v. 30; no. 1; p. 51-54; DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0051:PDOALR>2.0.CO;2
© 2002 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (22)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gvirtzman, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Partial detachment of a lithospheric root under the southeast Carpathians: Toward a better definition of the detachment concept

Zohar Gvirtzman1

1 Institute of Earth Sciences, Hebrew University, 91904 Jerusalem, Israel

The southeast corner of the Carpathian Mountains (Romania) provides a unique opportunity to study the very final and short- lived stage of plate convergence when a piece of subducted lithosphere finally detaches from the overriding plate and begins to sink into the mantle. Research efforts commonly focus on trying to image the cold lithospheric slab (tomographic techniques) and on trying to understand the tearing process from the earthquakes it generates. Here this issue is tackled from a different perspective emphasizing that the southeast Carpathians are extremely low considering crustal thickness; the crust there is almost as thick as the crust of the Alps (50–55 km), but the elevation is less than one- half of the elevation of the Alps. It is interesting that the Apennines (Italy) are just the opposite; they are rebounding after slab breakoff to reach elevations higher than expected from their crustal thickness (30–35 km like the crust of most passive-margin coasts). It is thus proposed that although seismologic studies indicate that the cold mantle body under the southeast Carpathians is already partly detached from the overriding lithosphere, it is still viscously coupled to the lithosphere and pulls it downward. By utilizing residual-topography analysis (observed topography minus the contribution of the crust to it), the subcrustal load is quantified and interpreted in terms of mantle-lithosphere thickness extending to a depth of ~300 km. A particularly interesting finding is that the seismically active region is shifted ~50 km east of the place of maximum pull-down, indicating that lithospheric tearing is now occurring at one side of the detaching root and not above it. This interpretation is consistent with the idea of lateral delamination of the lower lithosphere.

Key Words: Carpathians • Vrancea • detachment • breakoff • topography • buoyancy




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society of America Special PapersHome page
S. Harangi and L. Lenkey
Genesis of the Neogene to Quaternary volcanism in the Carpathian-Pannonian region: Role of subduction, extension, and mantle plume
Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 418(0): 67 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, MemoirsHome page
F. Horvath, G. Bada, P. Szafian, G. Tari, A. Adam, and S. Cloetingh
Formation and deformation of the Pannonian Basin: constraints from observational data
Geological Society, London, Memoirs, January 1, 2006; 32(1): 191 - 206.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America