Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; December 2002; v. 30; no. 12; p. 1059-1062; DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<1059:OAASCF>2.0.CO;2
© 2002 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kyle, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Open and almost shut case for explosive eruptions: Vent processes determined by SO2 emission rates at Karymsky volcano, Kamchatka

Tobias P. Fischer1, Kurt Roggensack2 and Philip R. Kyle3

1 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131-1116, USA
2 Department of Geological Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-1404, USA
3 Department of Earth and Environmental Science, New Mexico Tech, Socorro, New Mexico 87801, USA

Vent processes were examined at Karymsky volcano, Kamchatka, by measuring SO2 emissions using a correlation spectrometer (COSPEC). Continuous high-sensitivity COSPEC measurements and physical observations were collected on 11 and 12 September 1999, when Karymsky was producing small ashy eruptions every 5–20 min. Each eruptive event began with an explosion and audible rumbling (lasting ~30 s) followed in some cases by audible chugging (lasting to 2 min). Gas plumes accompanied each event, and almost without exception the plumes dissipated and became invisible despite significant SO2 emissions. Variations in SO2 output show distinctive patterns that correlate with eruption activity. Maximum SO2 output occurred following each explosion and then declined rapidly to low, but detectable levels. In contrast, a second type of event, often associated with audible chugging, was characterized by high SO2 output long after the initial ash blast. Variations in degassing at Karymsky can be explained by secondary boiling, gas-pressure accumulation, and vent resealing. We developed a new application of the COSPEC technique to study the dynamic vent processes of erupting volcanoes. This application provides insights into the processes that occur at the otherwise inaccessible vents of erupting volcanoes particularly when a volcano changes from passive degassing and small explosions to degassing patterns that may precede a larger and more dangerous eruption.

Key Words: SO2 flux • volcanology • second boiling • vent sealing • eruptions







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America