Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; February 2002; v. 30; no. 2; p. 135-138; DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0135:CCCPOP>2.0.CO;2
© 2002 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (27)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Troll, V.R.
Right arrow Articles by Schmincke, H.-U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Cyclic caldera collapse: Piston or piecemeal subsidence? Field and experimental evidence

V.R. Troll*,1, T.R. Walter*,1 and H.-U. Schmincke*,1

1 Abteilung für Vulkanologie and Petrologie, GEOMAR Forschungszentrum, Wischhofstrasse 1-3, 24148 Kiel, Germany

Many multicycle caldera volcanoes display a complex extracaldera fault system genetically linked to caldera evolution. On Gran Canaria (Canary Islands), the Miocene Tejeda caldera was filled by ignimbrites and epiclastic sediments and intruded by syenites and a major cone-sheet swarm, obscuring intracaldera structural relations. Extracaldera radial and circumferential faults and dikes are well exposed. We used field data and experiments scaled to the island of Gran Canaria to clarify the poorly understood structural, temporal, and genetic relationship of peripheral faults to the central caldera. The experimental setup comprises a cone of medium-grained sand in which a rubber balloon was repeatedly inflated and deflated. Balloon inflation resulted in updoming and a dominantly radial fault pattern, whereas balloon deflation caused piecemeal caldera collapse and a concentric peripheral fault arrangement on the edifice flanks. A complex interplay of repeated inflation and deflation cycles of the experimental magma chamber is found to explain the peripheral fault system of the Tejeda caldera on Gran Canaria and offers insight into the structure of the caldera floor and the mechanisms acting in multicycle caldera volcanoes.

Key Words: multicycle caldera volcanoes • analogue experiments • Tejeda caldera • Gran Canaria




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
J.C. Carracedo, E. R. Badiola, H. Guillou, M. Paterne, S. Scaillet, F.J. P. Torrado, R. Paris, U. Fra-Paleo, and A. Hansen
Eruptive and structural history of Teide Volcano and rift zones of Tenerife, Canary Islands
Geological Society of America Bulletin, September 1, 2007; 119(9-10): 1027 - 1051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
S. A. Stewart and R. J. Davies
Structure and emplacement of mud volcano systems in the South Caspian Basin
AAPG Bulletin, May 1, 2006; 90(5): 771 - 786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
K. Aizawa, V. Acocella, and T. Yoshida
How the development of magma chambers affects collapse calderas: insights from an overview
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2006; 269(1): 65 - 81.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America