Quick
Search: 		  
advanced search
 GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Geology; May 2002; v. 30; no. 5; p. 411-414; DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0411:HMP>2.0.CO;2
© 2002 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

How many plates?

Don L. Anderson*,1

1 California Institute of Technology, Seismological Laboratory, 1200 East California Boulevard, M/C 252-21, Pasadena, California 91125, USA

Herein I address the current number of plates, the number there should be, and whether there is a pattern in the plate mosaic. Related issues are the optimal sizes and shapes of plates and spacings of ridges, trenches, and transform faults. Similar questions arise in studies of foams, bubble rafts, buckyballs, mudcracks, columnar jointing, the tessellation of spheres, and the planforms of convection. In sphere-covering problems, and in dynamic problems, pentagons replace the familiar hexagons. The "ground" state of plate tectonics on a homogeneous planet may involve ~12 plates with five nearest and five next-nearest neighbors. The plate mosaic may be a self-organized network of plates and force chains, which are readily reorganized by stress changes. This paper starts with the premise that the mosaic may have simple and surficial explanations rather than convective or plutonic causes. The study of the tessellation of Earth can be called "platonics" to distinguish it from the idea that the lithosphere necessarily mirrors the planform of mantle convection.

Key Words: tectonics • plates • geodynamics • self-organization




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 GeologyHome page
P. Patriat, H. Sloan, and D. Sauter
From slow to ultraslow: A previously undetected event at the Southwest Indian Ridge at ca. 24 Ma
Geology, March 1, 2008; 36(3): 207 - 210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society of America Special PapersHome page
D. L. Anderson
The eclogite engine: Chemical geodynamics as a Galileo thermometer
Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 430(0): 47 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society of America Special PapersHome page
J. W. Sears
Lithospheric control of Gondwana breakup: Implications of a trans-Gondwana icosahedral fracture system
Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 430(0): 593 - 601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society of America Special PapersHome page
D. L. Anderson
Plate tectonics; the general theory: Complex Earth is simpler than you think
Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2006; 413(0): 29 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
D. Praeg
Diachronous Variscan late-orogenic collapse as a response to multiple detachments: a view from the internides in France to the foreland in the Irish Sea
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2004; 223(1): 89 - 138.
[Abstract] [PDF]


JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America