Quick
Search: 		  
advanced search
 GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Geology; September 2002; v. 30; no. 9; p. 827-830; DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0827:LPDATE>2.0.CO;2
© 2002 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (31)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rees, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Land-plant diversity and the end-Permian mass extinction

P. McAllister Rees*,1

1 Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, 5734 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA

The Permian and Triassic represent a time of major global climate change from icehouse to hothouse conditions and significant (~25°) northward motion of landmasses amalgamated in essentially one supercontinent, Pangea. The greatest of all mass extinctions occurred around the Permian-Triassic boundary (251 Ma), although there is no consensus regarding the cause(s). Recent studies have suggested a meteor impact and worldwide die-off of vegetation, on the basis of sparse local observations. However, new analyses of global Permian and Triassic plant data in a paleogeographic context show that the scale and timing of effects varied markedly between regions. The patterns are best explained by differences in geography, climate, and fossil preservation, not by catastrophic events. Caution should be exercised when extrapolating local observations to global-scale interpretations. At the other extreme, global compilations of biotic change through time can be misleading if the effects of geography, climate, and preservation bias are not considered.

Key Words: mass extinctions • Permian • Triassic • biodiversity • paleogeography • paleoclimate




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PaleobiologyHome page
A. Z. Krug and M. E. Patzkowsky
Geographic variation in turnover and recovery from the Late Ordovician mass extinction
Paleobiology, June 1, 2007; 33(3): 435 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeologyHome page
H. Kerp, A. A. Hamad, B. Vording, and K. Bandel
Typical Triassic Gondwanan floral elements in the Upper Permian of the paleotropics
Geology, April 1, 2006; 34(4): 265 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society of America Special PapersHome page
G. J. Retallack and E. S. Krull
Carbon isotopic evidence for terminal-Permian methane outbursts and their role in extinctions of animals, plants, coral reefs, and peat swamps
Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2006; 399(0): 249 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PALAIOSHome page
R. A. GASTALDO, R. ADENDORFF, M. BAMFORD, C. C. LABANDEIRA, J. NEVELING, and H. SIMS
Taphonomic Trends of Macrofloral Assemblages Across the Permian-Triassic Boundary, Karoo Basin, South Africa
Palaios, October 1, 2005; 20(5): 479 - 497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ScienceHome page
R. B. Huey and P. D. Ward
Hypoxia, Global Warming, and Terrestrial Late Permian Extinctions
Science, April 15, 2005; 308(5720): 398 - 401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America