Quick
Search: 		  
advanced search
 GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Geology; September 2002; v. 30; no. 9; p. 831-834; DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0831:BCITWF>2.0.CO;2
© 2002 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by Barnett, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Basement complexes in the Wasatch fault, Utah, provide new limits on crustal accretion

Stephen T. Nelson*,1, Ronald A. Harris*,1, Michael J. Dorais*,1, Matthew Heizler*,2, Kurt N. Constenius*,3 and Daniel E. Barnett*,4

1 Department of Geology, S389 ESC, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, USA
2 New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Tech, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, New Mexico 87801, USA
3 Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA
4 Parr Waddoups Brown Gee & Loveless, P.C., 185 South State Street, Suite 1300, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111, USA

New and reinterpreted isotopic data for crystalline rocks exposed in the Wasatch Range require a reevaluation of Precambrian crustal boundaries in Utah. Crystalline rocks of the Santaquin Complex underwent metamorphism prior to ca. 1670 Ma, consistent with Sr and Nd isotope data. Mafic to intermediate rocks have major element, trace element, and isotope ratios indicative of derivation in an arc accreted to the Archean craton in Proterozoic time, requiring the crustal suture to be north of the Santaquin Complex. Farther north, the Farmington Canyon Complex has been considered Archean based on published Nd model ages and discordant U/Pb zircon ages. However, Nd model ages and zircons could be inherited from sedimentary protoliths. U/Pb and electron microprobe ages of monazite have a mode at 1650 to 1700 Ma, concordant with the Santaquin Complex, and lack inheritance. We propose that the Farmington Canyon Complex was first cratonized from Archean-derived sediments in the Proterozoic, requiring a crustal suture to be north of it as well. Accretion ages of arc terranes in southeastern Wyoming are ~60–100 m.y. older than in Utah. Thus, a serious reevaluation of basement architecture in Utah is needed and a previously unrecognized temporal complexity of accretion is indicated.

Key Words: geochronology • igneous rocks • crustal origin • isotope geochemistry




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 GeosphereHome page
W. R. Premo, P. Castineiras, and J. L. Wooden
SHRIMP-RG U-Pb isotopic systematics of zircon from the Angel Lake orthogneiss, East Humboldt Range, Nevada: Is this really Archean crust?
Geosphere, December 1, 2008; 4(6): 963 - 975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society of America Special PapersHome page
J. W. Shervais
The significance of subduction-related accretionary complexes in early Earth processes
Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2006; 405(0): 173 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America