Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Murphy, J. B. Articles by Nance, R. D. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Do supercontinents introvert or extrovert?: Sm-Nd isotope evidence

¹ Department of Earth Sciences, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia B2G 2W5, Canada
² Department of Geological Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701, USA

In recent years, two end-member models for the formation of supercontinents have emerged. In the classical Wilson cycle, oceanic crust generated during supercontinent breakup (the interior ocean) is consumed during subsequent amalgamation so that the supercontinent turns "inside in" (introversion). Alternatively, following supercontinent breakup, the exterior margins of the dispersing continental fragments collide during reassembly so that the supercontinent turns "outside in" (extroversion). These end-member models can be distinguished by comparing the Sm-Nd crust-formation ages of accreted mafic complexes (e.g., ophiolites) in the collisional orogens formed during supercontinent assembly with the breakup age of the previous supercontinent. For supercontinents generated by introversion, these crust-formation ages postdate rifting of the previous supercontinent. For supercontinents generated by extroversion, the oceanic lithosphere consumed during reassembly predates breakup of the previous supercontinent, so that crust-formation ages of accreted mafic complexes are older than the age of rifting. In the Paleozoic Appalachian-Caledonide-Variscan orogen, a key collisional orogen in the assembly of Pangea, crust-formation ages of accretionary mafic complexes postdate the formation of the Iapetus Ocean (i.e., are younger than ca. 0.6 Ga), suggesting supercontinent reassembly by introversion. By contrast, the Neoproterozoic East African and Brasiliano orogens, which formed during the amalgamation of Gondwana, are characterized by mafic complexes with crust-formation ages (ca. 0.75–1.2 Ga) that predate the ca. 750 Ma breakup of Rodinia. Hence, these complexes must have formed from lithosphere in the exterior ocean that surrounded Rodinia, implying that this ocean was consumed during the amalgamation of Gondwana. These data indicate that Pangea and Gondwana were formed by introversion and extroversion, respectively, implying that supercontinents can be assembled by fundamentally distinct geodynamic processes.

Key Words: supercontinent • introversion • extroversion • Sm-Nd isotopes

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. B. Murphy and R. D. Nance The Pangea conundrum Geology, September 1, 2008; 36(9): 703 - 706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Aifa, P. Pruner, M. Chadima, and P. Storch Structural evolution of the Prague synform (Czech Republic) during Silurian times: An AMS, rock magnetism, and paleomagnetic study of the Svaty Jan pod Skalou dikes. Consequences for the nappes emplacement Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 423(0): 249 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. P. M. Vaughan, P. T. Leat, and R. J. Pankhurst Terrane processes at the margins of Gondwana: introduction Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2005; 246(1): 1 - 21. [Abstract] [PDF]