Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; October 2003; v. 31; no. 10; p. 881-884; DOI: 10.1130/G19601.1
© 2003 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muhuri, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Reches, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Interseismic fault strengthening and earthquake-slip instability: Friction or cohesion?

Sankar K. Muhuri*,1, Thomas A. Dewers*,1, Thurman E. Scott, Jr.*,2 and Ze'ev Reches*,3

1 School of Geology and Geophysics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, USA
2 Poromechanics Institute, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, USA
3 Institute of Earth Sciences, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel

The slip instability of an earthquake and its abrupt energy release depend primarily on the intensity of strength drop during accelerated fault slip. This process is typically attributed to changes of frictional resistance between two sliding blocks. Here we show that friction changes alone cannot explain observed strength variations of artificial fault zones. Sandstone samples with saw-cut faults and gypsum gouge zones were subjected to many cycles of hold-slide loading. Samples with water-saturated gouge display (1) systematic, time-dependent increase of gouge strength; (2) unstable failure of gouge with large stress drops; and (3) lithification of gouge by crack sealing, recrystallization, porosity reduction, and grain bonding. All these features are absent in identical tests with dry gouge. These observations indicate that gouge particles are cemented by chemical processes during hold periods and suggest that the cyclical strength variations are controlled by cohesion strengthening rather than by friction changes. We further hypothesize that crustal fault zones could be lithified during the interseismic stage, and this lithification would control earthquake-slip instability.

Key Words: earthquakes • fault strengthening • friction • cohesion • slip instability




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
F. Meneghini and J. C. Moore
Deformation and hydrofracture in a subduction thrust at seismogenic depths: The Rodeo Cove thrust zone, Marin Headlands, California
Geological Society of America Bulletin, January 1, 2007; 119(1-2): 174 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
D. A. Karlsen, J. E. Skeie, K. Backer-Owe, K. Bjorlykke, R. Olstad, K. Berge, M. Cecchi, E. Vik, and R. G. Schaefer
Petroleum migration, faults and overpressure. Part II. Case history: The Haltenbanken Petroleum Province, offshore Norway
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2004; 237(1): 305 - 372.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America