Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (14) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Angielczyk, K. D. Articles by Kurkin, A. A. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Has the utility of Dicynodon for Late Permian terrestrial biostratigraphy been overstated?

¹ Department of Integrative Biology and Museum of Paleontology, University of California, 1101 Valley Life Sciences Building, Berkeley, California 94720-4780, USA
² Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya 123, Moscow 117868, Russia

Dicynodont therapsids have long played an important role in global Late Permian and Triassic biostratigraphy, including recent studies of the effects of the extinction at the Permian-Triassic boundary on terrestrial vertebrates. In particular, the last appearance of the Late Permian taxon Dicynodon has been used to mark the Permian-Triassic boundary in the Karoo Basin of South Africa and to correlate this basin with others in Africa, Europe, and Asia. These practices assume that the named taxon Dicynodon corresponds to a biologically real entity. Here we present the results of a phylogenetic analysis that suggests that this is not the case. Our analysis includes two species referred to Dicynodon that occur only in Russia and the type species that occurs in southern Africa. Our results suggest that these three species do not form a clade to the exclusion of all other dicynodonts; the alternative hypothesis of a monophyletic Dicynodon is more weakly supported. Although preliminary, our analysis challenges the use of Dicynodon for biostratigraphic correlations between Russia and South Africa, and we urge caution in using this taxon to correlate other widely separated basins. This study also emphasizes that without phylogenetic information, there is no guarantee that named taxa represent biologically real entities, and the uncritical use of named taxa can easily lead to spurious biostratigraphic correlations.

Key Words: Dicynodontia • biostratigraphy • biochronology • Karoo Basin • Permian • Russia • South Africa • Therapsida

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Battail Late Permian dicynodont fauna from Laos Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2009; 315(1): 33 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Fildani, N. J. Drinkwater, A. Weislogel, T. McHargue, D. M. Hodgson, and S. S. Flint Age Controls on the Tanqua and Laingsburg Deep-Water Systems: New Insights on the Evolution and Sedimentary Fill of the Karoo Basin, South Africa Journal of Sedimentary Research, November 1, 2007; 77(11): 901 - 908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. D Roopnarine, K. D Angielczyk, S. C Wang, and R. Hertog Trophic network models explain instability of Early Triassic terrestrial communities Proc R Soc B, September 7, 2007; 274(1622): 2077 - 2086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. G. Lucas Global Permian tetrapod biostratigraphy and biochronology Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2006; 265(1): 65 - 93. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Phylogenetic evidence for and implications of a dual origin of propaliny in anomodont therapsids (Synapsida) Paleobiology, June 1, 2004; 30(2): 268 - 296.