Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; May 2003; v. 31; no. 5; p. 399-402; DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(2003)031<0399:PEFMDD>2.0.CO;2
© 2003 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Small, C.
Right arrow Articles by Danyushevsky, L. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Plate-kinematic explanation for mid-oceanic-ridge depth discontinuities

Christopher Small*,1 and Leonid V. Danyushevsky*,2

1 Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964, USA
2 School of Earth Sciences and Centre for Ore Deposit Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia

The global mid-ocean-ridge system is characterized by several regional-scale depth and geochemical anomalies. A prominent depth discontinuity between the East Pacific Rise and the Pacific-Antarctic Rise also coincides with a geochemical discontinuity that has been suggested by previous workers to indicate a boundary between distinct mantle- upwelling domains with separate convective histories. We propose a plate-kinematic origin for this discontinuity in which different rates of asthenospheric sequestration and spreading-center migration result in different equilibrium depths for different spreading centers. Absolute plate motions determine both the rate at which asthenosphere is converted to lithosphere (i.e., the sequestration rate) and the rate at which the spreading center moves relative to hotspots (i.e., the migration rate). If limits on the consumption (i.e., the sequestration/migration ratio) of asthenosphere by spreading centers are determined by the thickness and flux of asthenosphere, then the fast-spreading, slowly migrating East Pacific Rise should have a deeper equilibrium depth than the slower-spreading, rapidly migrating Pacific-Antarctic Rise. Sustained, localized asthenospheric consumption by the East Pacific Rise contrasts with the lower consumption and abundance of asthenospheric flux from hotspots near the Pacific-Antarctic Rise. A similar mechanism could explain the discontinuity between the localized depth anomaly on the Southwest Indian Ridge near the Bouvet hotspot and the much broader, but deeper, anomaly on the adjacent Mid-Atlantic Ridge, where asthenosphere is being transformed to lithosphere at more than three times the rate of the Southwest Indian or American-Antarctic Ridge. Geochemical evidence is consistent with the notion of deeper, more extensive melting under both of the spreading centers with anomalously high sequestration/migration ratios.

Key Words: mid-oceanic ridge • bathymetry • asthenosphere • hotspot







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America