Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; June 2003; v. 31; no. 6; p. 557-560; DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(2003)031<0557:UESFTL>2.0.CO;2
© 2003 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simms, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Uniquely extensive seismite from the latest Triassic of the United Kingdom: Evidence for bolide impact?

Michael J. Simms1

1 Department of Geology, Ulster Museum, National Museums & Galleries of Northern Ireland, Botanic Gardens, Belfast BT9 5AB, Northern Irel

A 2–4 m thick seismite, in places overlain by a previously unreported tsunamite, can be traced across >250,000 km2 of the outcrop and subcrop of the latest Triassic (Rhaetian) Cotham Member of the Penarth Group, United Kingdom, an extent unique for the British Phanerozoic. Its consistent thickness, intensity of deformation, and preferred orientations of slump-fold axes indicate a seismic event of M > 10 with an epicenter >600 km W or NW of central Britain. The magnitude of the event is incompatible with known terrestrial mechanisms (fault, volcano) but is consistent with a major bolide impact. A short, but unknown, interval separates the top of the Cotham Member seismite from major geochemical and biotic perturbations associated with the end-Triassic extinction, although a direct link between the seismite and these other events remains equivocal. The exceptional extent of "mega-seismites" such as this may prove a useful indicator of previously undocumented bolide impacts.

Key Words: Rhaetian • Triassic-Jurassic boundary • soft-sediment deformation • seismite • tsunamite




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
L. Mander, R. J. Twitchett, and M. J. Benton
Palaeoecology of the Late Triassic extinction event in the SW UK
Journal of the Geological Society, January 1, 2008; 165(1): 319 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America Special PapersHome page
P. A. Jannett and D. O. Terry Jr.
Stratigraphic expression of a regionally extensive impactite the Upper Cretaceous Fox Hills Formation of southwestern South Dakota
Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 437(0): 199 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
G. Shanmugam
The Tsunamite Problem
Journal of Sedimentary Research, May 1, 2006; 76(5): 718 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
South African Journal of GeologyHome page
E. A. Schneiderhan, H. N. Bhattacharya, U. Zimmermann, and J. Gutzmer
Archean seismites of the Ventersdorp Supergroup, South Africa
South African Journal of Geology, September 1, 2005; 108(3): 345 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
T. Hallam, P. Wignall, S. P. Hesselbo, S. A. Robinson, and F. Surlyk
Discussion on sea-level change and facies development across potential Triassic-Jurassic boundary horizons, SW Britain
Journal of the Geological Society, December 1, 2004; 161(6): 1053 - 1056.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
S. P. Hesselbo, S. P. Hesselbo, S. A. Robinson, and F. Surlyk
Sea-level change and facies development across potential Triassic-Jurassic boundary horizons, SW Britain
Journal of the Geological Society, May 1, 2004; 161(3): 365 - 379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America