Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; November 2004; v. 32; no. 11; p. 937-940; DOI: 10.1130/G20785.1
© 2004 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nagel, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Buck, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Symmetric alternative to asymmetric rifting models

Thorsten J. Nagel1 and W. Roger Buck1

1 Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10640, USA

We describe the first numerical simulation of continental rifting that reproduces the three major structures observed at magma-poor margins such as the Galicia Margin west of the Iberian Peninsula or the Apulia Margin in the Alps: (1) Distal continental margins consist of fault-bounded blocks separated by oceanward-dipping normal faults. (2) At the tip of the continent, lower crust is scarcely preserved or absent, and upper crust directly overlies exhumed mantle. (3) The base of the rotated crustal blocks is a prominent seismic reflector and represents a high strain zone with a top-to-the-ocean sense of shear. In our model, these structures do not reflect asymmetric rift geometry at a lithospheric scale. Instead, they derive from upper-crustal collapse over a mid-crustal shear zone into the rift center and are present on both sides of the rift axis. The model has a horizontal weak zone in the middle crust on top of strong lower crust and a localized vertical zone of thermal weakness in the rift center. We hypothesize that the development of a thermal perturbation and associated strain localization in the deeper lithosphere may cause the transition from widely distributed faulting and crustal thinning to constricted faulting directed toward a well-defined rift center.

Key Words: rifting • continental margin • detachment • numerical model • lower crust




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeologyHome page
R. F. Weinberg, K. Regenauer-Lieb, and G. Rosenbaum
Mantle detachment faults and the breakup of cold continental lithosphere
Geology, November 1, 2007; 35(11): 1035 - 1038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
T. J. Reston
The formation of non-volcanic rifted margins by the progressive extension of the lithosphere: the example of the West Iberian margin
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2007; 282(1): 77 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
S. Dyksterhuis, P. Rey, R. D. Muller, and L. Moresi
Effects of initial weakness on rift architecture
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2007; 282(1): 443 - 455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
A. Argnani, D. Fontana, C. Stefani, and G. G. Zuffa
Palaeogeography of the Upper Cretaceous-Eocene carbonate turbidites of the Northern Apennines from provenance studies
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2006; 262(1): 259 - 275.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America