Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; February 2004; v. 32; no. 2; p. 165-168; DOI: 10.1130/G20079.1
© 2004 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brand, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Alomía, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Fossil whale preservation implies high diatom accumulation rate in the Miocene–Pliocene Pisco Formation of Peru

Leonard R. Brand*,1, Raúl Esperante*,2, Arthur V. Chadwick*,3, Orlando Poma Porras*,4 and Merling Alomía*,4

1 Department of Natural Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California 92350, USA
2 Geoscience Research Institute, Loma Linda, California 92350, USA
3 Biology Department, Southwestern Adventist University, Keene, Texas 76059, USA
4 Universidad Peruana Unión, Carretera Central, km. 19, Ñaña, Lima, Peru

Diatomaceous deposits in the Miocene–Pliocene Pisco Formation contain abundant whales preserved in pristine condition (bones articulated or at least closely associated), in some cases including preserved baleen. The well-preserved whales indicate rapid burial. The 346 whales within ~1.5 km2 of surveyed surface were not buried as an event, but were distributed uninterrupted through an 80-m-thick sedimentary section. The diatomaceous sediment lacks repeating primary laminations, but instead is mostly massive, with irregular laminations and speckles. There is no evidence for bioturbation by invertebrates in the whale-bearing sediment. Current depositional models do not account for the volume of diatomaceous sediments or the taphonomic features of the whales. These taphonomic and sedimentary features suggest that rapid burial due to high diatom accumulation, in part by lateral advection into protected, shallow embayments, is responsible for the superb preservation of these whales, leading to a higher upper limit on phytoplankton accumulation rates than previously documented.

Key Words: taphonomy • diatoms • Pisco Formation • Miocene • Pliocene • Cetacea • sedimentation rates




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
M. H. Schweitzer, J. L Wittmeyer, and J. R Horner
Soft tissue and cellular preservation in vertebrate skeletal elements from the Cretaceous to the present
Proc R Soc B, January 22, 2007; 274(1607): 183 - 197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PALAIOSHome page
R. B. IRMIS and D. K. ELLIOTT
TAPHONOMY OF A MIDDLE PENNSYLVANIAN MARINE VERTEBRATE ASSEMBLAGE AND AN ACTUALISTIC MODEL FOR MARINE ABRASION OF TEETH
Palaios, October 1, 2006; 21(5): 466 - 479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America