Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; March 2004; v. 32; no. 3; p. 245-248; DOI: 10.1130/G19958.1
© 2004 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saleeby, J.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Topographic response to mantle lithosphere removal in the southern Sierra Nevada region, California

Jason Saleeby*,1 and Zorka Foster1

1 Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, M.S. 100-23, Pasadena, California 91125, USA

Geological studies of mantle xenoliths entrained in late Neogene–Quaternary lavas from the southern Sierra Nevada region and regional geophysical studies suggest that the high-density mantle lithosphere that formed beneath the Sierra Nevada batholith in conjunction with arc magmatism is being convectively removed as a "drip" structure. This structure, as imaged seismically, is roughly cylindrical in shape with a diameter of ~100 km, and extends to ~225 km depth. Centered above this structure is a region ~120 km in diameter that is undergoing active subsidence relative to adjacent regions. Such subsidence is seen in the active fluvial-alluvial sediment flooding of mountainous topography of the southwestern Sierra and in the development of the adjacent Tulare Lake basin of the San Joaquin Valley. Dynamic modeling of such upper-mantle drip structures predicts a phase of overlying surface subsidence during the most vigorous phase of drip formation. The southern Sierra upper mantle drip and the overlying crust appear to be in this phase of their dynamically coupled evolution.

Key Words: dynamic topography • mantle drip • basin subsidence




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geol Soc Am BullHome page
C.J. Busby, S.B. DeOreo, I. Skilling, P.B. Gans, and J.C. Hagan
Carson Pass-Kirkwood paleocanyon system: Paleogeography of the ancestral Cascades arc and implications for landscape evolution of the Sierra Nevada (California)
GSA Bulletin, March 1, 2008; 120(3-4): 274 - 299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
J. DUFEK and G. W. BERGANTZ
Lower Crustal Magma Genesis and Preservation: a Stochastic Framework for the Evaluation of Basalt-Crust Interaction
J. Petrology, November 1, 2005; 46(11): 2167 - 2195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
Tempo of burial and exhumation within the deep roots of a magmatic arc, Fiordland, New Zealand
Geology, January 1, 2005; 33(1): 17 - 20.





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Geological Society of America