Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; April 2004; v. 32; no. 4; p. 321-324; DOI: 10.1130/G20177.2
© 2004 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flowers, R.M.
Right arrow Articles by Bowring, S.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Isostatic constraints on the assembly, stabilization, and preservation of cratonic lithosphere

R.M. Flowers*,1, L.H. Royden*,1 and S.A. Bowring*,1

1 Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

Cratonic uplift or subsidence, as recorded geologically by erosion or deposition, indicates the net change in lithospheric buoyancy. Density change is primarily controlled by temperature change, such that the geologic record reveals the net lithospheric heating or cooling. Our modeling shows that thermal stabilization of lithosphere can occur in <100 m.y., largely determined by the time for crustal radioactivity to warm the entire lithosphere. Longer-term thermal evolution (350–400 m.y.) is controlled by the feedback between isostatic and thermal responses. Crustal heat production is the dominant factor for evolution of crustal geo therms, whereas the detailed initial thermal structure is less important. The fact that many cratons are eroded to only modest depths indicates that they have a history of warming slightly since their formation, implying a rather cool 700–1000 °C for initial lithospheric mantle. This is consistent with the growth of cratonic lithosphere by progressive thickening during continental assembly and/or subduction stacking of oceanic lithosphere. Relatively warm early lithosphere due to elevated crustal heat production or higher initial lithospheric mantle temperatures may have had a lower preservation potential due to preferential deformation and destruction. Study of the Proterozoic orogen of the southwestern United States indicates that the distinct thermal and isostatic records of adjacent crustal blocks are compatible with observed differences in crustal heat production, but also with similar initial lithospheric mantle temperatures.

Key Words: lithosphere • thermal evolution • assembly • stabilization • preservation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
South African Journal of GeologyHome page
M. de Wit
The Kalahari Epeirogeny and climate change: differentiating cause and effect from core to space
South African Journal of Geology, September 1, 2007; 110(2-3): 367 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Geological Society of America