Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; October 2005; v. 33; no. 10; p. 817-820; DOI: 10.1130/G21707.1
© 2005 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ziegler, K.
Right arrow Articles by Brzezinski, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

{delta}30Si systematics in a granitic saprolite, Puerto Rico

Karen Ziegler*,1, Oliver A. Chadwick1, Art F. White2 and Mark A. Brzezinski3

1 Department of Geography, University of California–Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA
2 U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA
3 Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, and the Marine Science Institute, University of California–Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA

Granite weathering and clay mineral formation impart distinct and interpretable stable Si isotope ({delta}30Si) signatures to their solid and aqueous products. Within a saprolite, clay minerals have {delta}30Si values ~2.0{per thousand} more negative than their parent mineral and the {delta}30Si signature of the bulk solid is determined by the ratio of primary to secondary minerals. Mineral-specific weathering reactions predominate at different depths, driving changes in differing {delta}30Sipore water values. At the bedrock-saprolite interface, dissolution of plagioclase and hornblende creates {delta}30Sipore water signatures more positive than granite by up to 1.2{per thousand}; these reactions are the main contributor of Si to stream water and determine its {delta}30Si value. Throughout the saprolite, biotite weathering releases Si to pore waters but kaolinite overgrowth formation modulates its contribution to pore-water Si. The influence of biotite on {delta}30Sipore water is greatest near the bedrock where biotite-derived Si mixes with bulk pore water prior to kaolinite formation. Higher in the saprolite, biotite grains have become more isolated by kaolinite overgrowth, which consumes biotite-derived Si that would otherwise influence {delta}30Sipore water. Because of this isolation, which shifts the dominant source of pore-water Si from biotite to quartz, {delta}30Sipore water values are more negative than granite by up to 1.3{per thousand} near the top of the saprolite.

Key Words: tropical soil • river chemistry • clay minerals • Si isotopes




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeologyHome page
S. H.J.M. van den Boorn, M. J. van Bergen, W. Nijman, and P. Z. Vroon
Dual role of seawater and hydrothermal fluids in Early Archean chert formation: Evidence from silicon isotopes
Geology, October 1, 2007; 35(10): 939 - 942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America