Quick
Search: 		  
advanced search
 GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Geology; February 2005; v. 33; no. 2; p. 101-104; DOI: 10.1130/G20930.1
© 2005 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shackleton, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sussman, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Evidence for temporally changing mechanical stratigraphy and effects on joint-network architecture

J. Ryan Shackleton1, Michele L. Cooke1 and Aviva J. Sussman*,2

1 Department of Geosciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA
2 Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA

Previous studies of jointing in sedimentary rocks have shown that joint-network architecture is controlled by mechanical stratigraphy, which is described by (1) the thickness and rigidity of stratigraphic units and (2) the nature of interfaces between beds. Using joint pattern to infer rigidity contrast between beds is complicated by the possibility that material properties of the beds may change between fracturing events. Observation of both an early bed-contained joint set and a differently oriented late throughgoing joint set in the same beds of growth strata in the Oliana anticline in the Spanish Pyrenees may reflect changing mechanical properties (i.e., via diagenesis) during the folding process. Using a Schmidt hammer, we assess the rigidity contrast between the individual units and show that the present-day contrast is not great enough to terminate joints at interfaces. This result is consistent with an interpretation that the late-stage throughgoing joints formed in strata with conditions similar to those of the present day and that the early bed-contained joints formed when the rigidity contrast between beds was significantly greater than that of the present day. For example, differential diagenesis rates between layers of differing grain size would produce temporally changing mechanical stratigraphy. We propose that changes in mechanical stratigraphy may have previously been unrecognized in other stratigraphic sections and that these changes affect joint-network architecture and subsequent fluid-flow pathways.

Key Words: mechanical stratigraphy • growth strata • joint • propagation • termination • Oliana anticline




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 AAPG BulletinHome page
S. E. Laubach, J. E. Olson, and M. R. Gross
Mechanical and fracture stratigraphy
AAPG Bulletin, November 1, 2009; 93(11): 1413 - 1426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
M. R. Gross and Y. Eyal
Throughgoing fractures in layered carbonate rocks
Geological Society of America Bulletin, November 1, 2007; 119(11-12): 1387 - 1404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 AAPG BulletinHome page
C. L. Hanks, T. M. Parris, and W. K. Wallace
Fracture paragenesis and microthermometry in Lisburne Group detachment folds: Implications for the thermal and structural evolution of the northeastern Brooks Range, Alaska
AAPG Bulletin, January 1, 2006; 90(1): 1 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America