|
|
 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
 |
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Quaternary Research Center and Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Box 351310, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
On the basis of the Manning equation and basic mass conservation principles, we derive an expression for scaling the steady-state width (W) of river channels as a function of discharge (Q), channel slope (S), roughness (n), and width-to-depth ratio (
): W = [( + 2)2/3]3/8Q3/8S–3/16n3/8. We propose that channel width-to-depth ratio, in addition to roughness, is a function of the material in which the channel is developed, and that where a river is confined to a given material, width-to-depth ratio and roughness can be assumed constant. Given these simplifications, the expression emulates traditional width-discharge relationships for rivers incising bedrock with uniformly concave fluvial long profiles. More significantly, this relationship describes river width trends in terrain with spatially nonuniform rock uplift rates, where conventional discharge-based width scaling laws are inadequate. We suggest that much of observed channel width variability in river channels confined by bedrock is a simple consequence of the tendency for water to flow faster in steeper reaches and therefore occupy smaller channel cross sections. We demonstrate that using conventional scaling relationships for channel width can result in underestimation of stream-power variability in channels incising bedrock and that our model improves estimates of spatial patterns of bedrock incision rates.
Key Words: fluvial geomorphology • tectonic geomorphology • channel width • river incision • landscape evolution
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. D. Pelletier, T. Engelder, D. Comeau, A. Hudson, M. Leclerc, A. Youberg, and S. Diniega Tectonic and structural control of fluvial channel morphology in metamorphic core complexes: The example of the Catalina-Rincon core complex, Arizona Geosphere, August 1, 2009; 5(4): 363 - 384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Noda, T. TuZino, R. Furukawa, M. Joshima, and J.-i. Uchida Physiographical and sedimentological characteristics of submarine canyons developed upon an active forearc slope: The Kushiro Submarine Canyon, northern Japan Geological Society of America Bulletin, May 1, 2008; 120(5-6): 750 - 767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. P. Snyder and L. L. Kammer Dynamic adjustments in channel width in response to a forced diversion: Gower Gulch, Death Valley National Park, California Geology, February 1, 2008; 36(2): 187 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. J. Finnegan, B. Hallet, D. R. Montgomery, P. K. Zeitler, J. O. Stone, A. M. Anders, and L. Yuping Coupling of rock uplift and river incision in the Namche Barwa Gyala Peri massif, Tibet Geological Society of America Bulletin, January 1, 2008; 120(1-2): 142 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. C. Whittaker, P. A. Cowie, M. Attal, G. E. Tucker, and G. P. Roberts Bedrock channel adjustment to tectonic forcing: Implications for predicting river incision rates Geology, February 1, 2007; 35(2): 103 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. C. Galster, F. J. Pazzaglia, B. R. Hargreaves, D. P. Morris, S. C. Peters, and R. N. Weisman Effects of urbanization on watershed hydrology: The scaling of discharge with drainage area Geology, September 1, 2006; 34(9): 713 - 716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. J. Hardy Fluvial geomorphology Progress in Physical Geography, August 1, 2006; 30(4): 553 - 567. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. C. Mitchell Morphologies of knickpoints in submarine canyons Geological Society of America Bulletin, May 1, 2006; 118(5-6): 589 - 605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
