Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; April 2005; v. 33; no. 4; p. 301-304; DOI: 10.1130/G21095.1
© 2005 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Babault, J.
Right arrow Articles by Van Den Driessche, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Influence of piedmont sedimentation on erosion dynamics of an uplifting landscape: An experimental approach

Julien Babault*,1, Stéphane Bonnet1, Alain Crave1 and Jean Van Den Driessche1

1 Géosciences Rennes, Université de Rennes 1, UMR CNRS 6118, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes cedex, France

Models of relief development generally assume that eroded products are evacuated far from the landscape, whereas in nature they are often deposited at the foot of mountain belts, within continental environments. Because piedmont aggradation can modify the base level for erosion, we investigate the influence of piedmont sedimentation on the dynamics of an upstream relief. We developed an experimental study of relief dynamics using laboratory-scale models submitted to uplift under runoff-driven erosion. We compare the dynamics of topographies surrounded, or not, by a depositional belt made of eroded products coming from upstream. Piedmont aggradation acts on the dynamics of the upstream relief by modifying the relative uplift rate (applied uplift rate minus aggradation rate) that denudation tends to balance. Relief denudes at a lower rate than the applied uplift rate, so the mean elevation of the uplifting topography rises. When the time scale of aggradation is higher than the time scale of relief development, the topography cannot reach a steady state between denudation and the applied uplift rate as long as aggradation occurs. However, in this case denudation balances a continuously varying relative uplift rate during a dynamic equilibrium phase of the topography.

Key Words: relief dynamics • uplift • erosion • sedimentation • denudation • experimental modeling




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
P. A. Allen
Time scales of tectonic landscapes and their sediment routing systems
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2008; 296(1): 7 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
S. Bonnet and A. Crave
Macroscale dynamics of experimental landscapes
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2006; 253(1): 327 - 339.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America