Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; May 2005; v. 33; no. 5; p. 353-356; DOI: 10.1130/G21262.1
© 2005 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carminati, E.
Right arrow Articles by Santantonio, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Control of differential compaction on the geometry of sediments onlapping paleoescarpments: Insights from field geology (Central Apennines, Italy) and numerical modeling

Eugenio Carminati*,1 and Massimo Santantonio1

1 Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Roma "La Sapienza," Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Rome, Italy

Basin strata onlapping pelagic carbonate platform margins in the Central Apennines commonly dip considerably (as much as 20°–30°) toward the basin when platform strata (Calcare Massiccio) are retrodeformed to horizontal in order to undo the tilting related to Apenninic compressional tectonics. These angular relationships are commonly ascribed to normal drag associated with synsedimentary faulting. We show that such angular relationships are fully consistent with results of numerical simulations that aim at modeling first-order geometric features associated with sedimentation and compaction of deposits onlapping the escarpment at the margin of basins. Therefore, growth of an underlying normal fault is not generally required to generate them. This conclusion is also supported by field investigations of the contacts at pelagic carbonate platform margins and by paleoescarpment analysis, which strongly suggest post–early Liassic tectonic quiescence.

Key Words: compaction • paleoescarpments • Jurassic • Central Apennines




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
I. MARTIN-ROJAS, R. SOMMA, F. DELGADO, A. ESTeVEZ, A. IANNACE, V. PERRONE, and V. ZAMPARELLI
Triassic continental rifting of Pangaea: direct evidence from the Alpujarride carbonates, Betic Cordillera, SE Spain
Journal of the Geological Society, May 1, 2009; 166(3): 447 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Petroleum GeoscienceHome page
I. A. Fard, A. Braathen, M. Mokhtari, and S. A. Alavi
Interaction of the Zagros Fold-Thrust Belt and the Arabian-type, deep-seated folds in the Abadan Plain and the Dezful Embayment,SW Iran
Petroleum Geoscience, November 1, 2006; 12(4): 347 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America