Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; May 2005; v. 33; no. 5; p. 401-404; DOI: 10.1130/G21190.1
© 2005 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Yeats, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Paleomagnetism-based limits on earthquake magnitudes in northwestern metropolitan Los Angeles, California, USA

Shaul Levi1, John Nabelek1 and Robert S. Yeats2

1 College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-5503, USA
2 Department of Geosciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA

We have used paleomagnetism to estimate the maximum moment magnitude (Mw) of earthquakes in the east Ventura Basin and San Fernando Valley, in metropolitan Los Angeles. Magnetic declinations show differential rotation between crustal blocks with linear dimensions of 10–20 km, similar to the thickness of the seismogenic layer. The maximum magnitude of an earthquake based on blocks of this size is Mw = 6.8, comparable to the 1971 San Fernando and 1994 Northridge earthquakes and consistent with paleoseismic trenching and surface ruptures of the 1971 earthquake. The paleomagnetic results suggest that the blocks have retained their configuration while moving relative to each other for the past ~0.8 m.y. Therefore, it is unlikely that in this area multiple blocks combined to trigger much larger shocks during this period, in contrast to adjacent regions where events with Mw > 7 have been postulated on the basis of paleoseismic excavations.

Key Words: paleomagnetism • block rotations • earthquake magnitude • seismic moment







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Geological Society of America