Quick
Search: 		  
advanced search
 GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help 
Geology Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Geology; June 2005; v. 33; no. 6; p. 501-504; DOI: 10.1130/G21142.1
© 2005 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roberge, J.
Right arrow Articles by Coffin, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Anomalous uplift and subsidence of the Ontong Java Plateau inferred from CO2 contents of submarine basaltic glasses

Julie Roberge1, Paul J. Wallace1, Rosalind V. White2 and Millard F. Coffin3

1 Department of Geological Sciences, 1272 University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1272, USA
2 Department of Geology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
3 Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 164-8639, Japan

The Ontong Java Plateau in the western Pacific is anomalous compared to other oceanic large igneous provinces in that it appears to have never formed a large subaerial plateau. Paleoeruption depths (at 122 Ma) estimated from dissolved H2O and CO2 in submarine basaltic glass pillow rims vary from ~1100 m below sea level (mbsl) on the central part of the plateau to 2200–3000 mbsl on the northeastern edge. Our results suggest maximum initial uplift for the plateau of 2500–3600 m above the surrounding seafloor and 1500 ± 400 m of postemplacement subsidence since 122 Ma. Our estimates of uplift and subsidence for the plateau are significantly less than predictions from thermal models of oceanic lithosphere, and thus our results are inconsistent with formation of the plateau by a high-temperature mantle plume. Two controversial possibilities to explain the anomalous uplift and subsidence are that the plateau (1) formed as a result of a giant bolide impact, or (2) formed from a mantle plume but has a lower crust of dense garnet granulite and/or eclogite; neither of these possibilities is fully consistent with all available geological, geophysical, and geochemical data. The origin of the largest magmatic event on Earth in the past 200 m.y. thus remains an enigma.

Key Words: large igneous province • basalt • volatiles • mantle plume • meteorite impact




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 GeologyHome page
R. Navarro-Gonzalez, S. A. Mahan, A. K. Singhvi, R. Navarro-Aceves, J.-L. Rajot, C. P. McKay, P. Coll, and F. Raulin
Paleoecology reconstruction from trapped gases in a fulgurite from the late Pleistocene of the Libyan Desert
Geology, February 1, 2007; 35(2): 171 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society of America Special PapersHome page
G. R. Foulger
The "plate" model for the genesis of melting anomalies
Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 430(0): 1 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ELEMENTSHome page
D. L. Anderson
Large Igneous Provinces, Delamination, and Fertile Mantle
Elements, December 1, 2005; 1(5): 271 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America