Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; July 2005; v. 33; no. 7; p. 533-536; DOI: 10.1130/G21342.1
© 2005 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nimmo, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Tectonic consequences of Martian dichotomy modification by lower-crustal flow and erosion

Francis Nimmo1

1 Department of Earth Sciences, University of California–Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA

The Martian hemispheric dichotomy shows compressional features a few hundred kilometers south of the dichotomy boundary, and contemporaneous extensional features along the boundary. Two processes that may have contributed to the observed deformation are lateral lower-crustal flow and erosion. Crustal flow causes a decrease in crustal thickness in the south, and an increase in the north. The result is compressional surface stresses in the highlands and extensional stresses around the dichotomy boundary. The magnitude, location, and timing of the predicted stresses are consistent with the observed tectonic features and strongly suggest that moderate lateral flow occurred. For the nominal heat flux and rheology, sufficient lateral flow is generated for a mean crustal thickness of 70 km. Erosion generates extension in the south and compression in the north, opposite to what is observed. Either erosion only resulted in local, as opposed to regional, distribution of highland material, or the rigidity of the lithosphere was sufficiently high at the time of erosion that significant stresses did not develop.

Key Words: Mars • tectonics • rheology • stress • rigidity







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Geological Society of America