Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; July 2005; v. 33; no. 7; p. 537-540; DOI: 10.1130/G21577.1
© 2005 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lindberg, B.
Right arrow Articles by Mienert, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Postglacial carbonate production by cold-water corals on the Norwegian Shelf and their role in the global carbonate budget

Björn Lindberg*,1 and Jürgen Mienert1

1 Department of Geology, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway

Cold-water coral reefs have been neglected in calculations of global carbonate production. We present the first calculations of the amount of CaCO3 produced by cold-water corals on the Norwegian Shelf in postglacial time, showing that the reef-building Lophelia pertusa in Norwegian waters contributes ~54–188 g/m2/ yr locally, or 0.03–0.38 g/m2/yr averaged over the entire shelf. These estimates indicate that cold-water reef CaCO3 flux is 4%– 12% of the tropical reefs. A first tentative global estimate indicates that cold-water coral CaCO3 production could add >1% to the total marine CaCO3 production. The spatial and temporal evolution of cold-water reefs, and thus their influence on atmospheric CO2, is difficult to reconstruct, but factors that dominantly influence the rate of coral growth include sea-level and oceanographic changes, submarine slides, and anthropogenic activity. The results show that other shelf and slope environments should be assessed in a similar manner to further constrain and evaluate the global CaCO3 production by cold-water corals and their possible contribution to the CaCO3 budget.

Key Words: cold-water coral reefs • carbonate production • Holocene • Norwegian Shelf







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America