Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; September 2005; v. 33; no. 9; p. 697-700; DOI: 10.1130/G21733.1
© 2005 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coe, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bowen, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Yellowstone hotspot volcanism in California? A paleomagnetic test of the Lovejoy flood basalt hypothesis

Robert S. Coe1, Greg M. Stock2, John J. Lyons3, Brenda Beitler4 and Gabriel J. Bowen5

1 Department of Earth Sciences, University of California–Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California 95060, USA
2 Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
3 Department of Earth Sciences, University of California–Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California 95060, USA
4 Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA
5 Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA

In 2000, D.L. Wagner and colleagues hypothesized that the middle Miocene Yellowstone hotspot volcanism thought to have produced the great expanses of Columbia River and Oregon Plateau Basalts also gave rise to the Lovejoy Basalt of California. Paleomagnetic directions of lava flows of the Lovejoy Basalt in isolated localities scattered more than 200 km across northeastern and central California show that they were erupted rapidly and that some of them traveled great distances. Most of the paleomagnetic directions form a tight cluster distinct from the Miocene mean field direction for the region, indicating eruption within a relatively short time span compared to geomagnetic secular variation—that is, within a few hundred to a few thousand years. Directional correlations demonstrate that some flows traveled at least 75 km and likely as much as 200 km. These findings support the hypothesis that the Lovejoy flows are flood basalts that compose a large southwestward extension of Yellowstone hotspot volcanism.

Key Words: flood basalts • Sierra Nevada • paleomagnetism • correlation • Columbia River Basalt




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeosphereHome page
B. Cousens, J. Prytulak, C. Henry, A. Alcazar, and T. Brownrigg
Geology, geochronology, and geochemistry of the Miocene-Pliocene Ancestral Cascades arc, northern Sierra Nevada, California and Nevada: The roles of the upper mantle, subducting slab, and the Sierra Nevada lithosphere
Geosphere, October 1, 2008; 4(5): 829 - 853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Field GuidesHome page
E.M. Moores, J. Wakabayashi, J.R. Unruh, and S. Waechter
A transect spanning 500 million years of active plate margin history: Outline and field trip guide
Field Guides, April 1, 2006; 7(0): 373 - 413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America