Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kwoun, O.-I. Articles by Wicks, C. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Quiescent deformation of the Aniakchak Caldera, Alaska, mapped by InSAR

¹ Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Center for Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS), Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57198, USA
² U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Volcano Observatory, Anchorage, Alaska 99508, USA
³ U.S. Geological Survey, Earthquake and Volcano Hazards Program, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA

The 10-km-wide caldera of the historically active Aniakchak volcano, Alaska, subsides 13 mm/yr, based on data from 19 European Remote Sensing Satellite (ERS-1 and ERS-2) interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) images from 1992 through 2002. The pattern of subsidence does not reflect the distribution of pyroclastic deposits from the last eruption in 1931 and therefore is not related to compaction of fragmental debris. Weighted least-squares inversion of the deformation maps indicates a relatively constant subsidence rate. Modeling the deformation with a Mogi point source locates the source of subsidence at 4 km below the central caldera floor, which is consistent with the inferred depth of magma storage before the 1931 eruption. Magmatic CO₂ and He have been measured at a warm soda spring within the caldera, and several sub-boiling fumaroles persist elsewhere in the caldera. These observations suggest that recent subsidence can be explained by the cooling or degassing of a shallow magma body (4 km deep), and/or the reduction of the pore-fluid pressure of a cooling hydrothermal system. Ongoing deformation of the volcano detected by InSAR, in combination with magmatic gas output from at least one warm spring, and infrequent low-level bursts of seismicity below the caldera, indicate that the volcanic system is still active and requires close attention for the timely detection of possible hazards.

Key Words: volcanic processes • deformation • SAR • interferometry

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. E. Joyce, S. E. Belliss, S. V. Samsonov, S. J. McNeill, and P. J. Glassey A review of the status of satellite remote sensing and image processing techniques for mapping natural hazards and disasters Progress in Physical Geography, April 1, 2009; 33(2): 183 - 207. [Abstract] [PDF]